A “Space Intelligence” demo video went viral, with a 73.4% surge in just two days—yet the video barely mentioned a single word about encryption. So why did it pump this crazily?
Here’s what happened: Space and Time released a demo that reconstructs 2D street-view footage into a time-stamped 3D Gaussian point-cloud world. On GitHub, the God’s Eye View project shot straight to 41,200 stars and 8,400 forks, and it even got a stage appearance from Brendan Eich. The technology is truly flashy—however, the question is: what does this have to do with tokens?
I read through the entire thread and the follow-up discussions—there are no tokens, no fee capture, and no on-chain payment data. This batch of AI infrastructure tokens (TAO, RENDER, AKT, AR) had already been trending up over the past seven days (anywhere from 40% to 73%). Before the demo went viral, it was already running. Slapping this rally onto a single tweet like “the demo caused it” is basically concluding first and then looking for reasons.
Star count and fork count reflect real developer attention, but they don’t equal revenue, they don’t equal retention, and they don’t equal enterprises actually paying real money.
This AR wave can’t really catch on—it’ll run out of steam and likely pull back. What’s rising is the AI-infrastructure narrative, not the idea that this specific demo somehow directly generated on-chain income. The only way to flip the story is if Space and Time truly turns this 3D reconstruction pipeline into a paid API that businesses are willing to pay for—if they publish the data, then the demand counts. Until then, this is just emotional premium riding on AI hype. Don’t fool yourself.
$AR $RENDER #AI
Here’s what happened: Space and Time released a demo that reconstructs 2D street-view footage into a time-stamped 3D Gaussian point-cloud world. On GitHub, the God’s Eye View project shot straight to 41,200 stars and 8,400 forks, and it even got a stage appearance from Brendan Eich. The technology is truly flashy—however, the question is: what does this have to do with tokens?
I read through the entire thread and the follow-up discussions—there are no tokens, no fee capture, and no on-chain payment data. This batch of AI infrastructure tokens (TAO, RENDER, AKT, AR) had already been trending up over the past seven days (anywhere from 40% to 73%). Before the demo went viral, it was already running. Slapping this rally onto a single tweet like “the demo caused it” is basically concluding first and then looking for reasons.
Star count and fork count reflect real developer attention, but they don’t equal revenue, they don’t equal retention, and they don’t equal enterprises actually paying real money.
This AR wave can’t really catch on—it’ll run out of steam and likely pull back. What’s rising is the AI-infrastructure narrative, not the idea that this specific demo somehow directly generated on-chain income. The only way to flip the story is if Space and Time truly turns this 3D reconstruction pipeline into a paid API that businesses are willing to pay for—if they publish the data, then the demand counts. Until then, this is just emotional premium riding on AI hype. Don’t fool yourself.
$AR $RENDER #AI