The Congress is still bickering, while the SEC and CFTC have already moved.
I saw the news: the CFTC Chair weighed in— the CLARITY Act is stuck in the Senate, but that doesn’t stop federal agencies from pushing crypto rules forward on their own.
This path was actually laid out ahead of time. On September 17, the SEC used a “temporary innovation exemption” to loosen the leash for certain tokenized on-chain trades of U.S. stocks. Back then, I felt that what really works might not be the bill itself, but this kind of “open a loophole first” maneuver. 🤔
Looking at these two things together is pretty interesting: getting a bill voted on requires negotiation and back-and-forth that can take months; exemptions and administrative rules don’t. Regulatory statements can be implemented quickly. One is slow, one is fast—so don’t just stare at that congressional spotlight. Often, it’s the administrative side that actually changes the rules: smaller moves, faster execution, and not as much headline-grabbing.
But one thing to remember: what can be “temporarily” opened can also be taken back at any time. Tight and loose are written with the same pen.
📡 I’d like to hear your take: do you think this kind of “exemption first” approach is reliable?
👉 关注我，点击进入聊天室，学习更多策略
#sec批准代币化nms股票交易临时创新豁免
I saw the news: the CFTC Chair weighed in— the CLARITY Act is stuck in the Senate, but that doesn’t stop federal agencies from pushing crypto rules forward on their own.
This path was actually laid out ahead of time. On September 17, the SEC used a “temporary innovation exemption” to loosen the leash for certain tokenized on-chain trades of U.S. stocks. Back then, I felt that what really works might not be the bill itself, but this kind of “open a loophole first” maneuver. 🤔
Looking at these two things together is pretty interesting: getting a bill voted on requires negotiation and back-and-forth that can take months; exemptions and administrative rules don’t. Regulatory statements can be implemented quickly. One is slow, one is fast—so don’t just stare at that congressional spotlight. Often, it’s the administrative side that actually changes the rules: smaller moves, faster execution, and not as much headline-grabbing.
But one thing to remember: what can be “temporarily” opened can also be taken back at any time. Tight and loose are written with the same pen.
📡 I’d like to hear your take: do you think this kind of “exemption first” approach is reliable?
👉 关注我，点击进入聊天室，学习更多策略
#sec批准代币化nms股票交易临时创新豁免
