#revolut黑客索要300万美元门罗币
[👉 门罗币赎金这事，群里聊](https://app.binance.com/uni-qr/TdcVf6Ho)
Last week, a gang that used fake government emails to trick clients into handing over their information has changed its price 🔒
They demanded $3 million from Revolut, specifying Monero as the payment currency.
The price dropped from a higher figure, and they gave a deadline of 24 hours. If they couldn’t reach a deal, they would sell the client files in batches.
The main targets are users with larger holdings of crypto assets, with around 680 files involved.
Inside are passports, bank account numbers, and a section listing Bitcoin holdings.
Switching to Monero is quite particular. The Bitcoin transfer path is publicly traceable.
Monero obscures the trail, making investigations completely different in difficulty.
For fintech companies, what they store for users isn’t just cash, but also on-chain asset records.
After the data leak, phishing emails are tailored precisely to the details of a user’s holdings.
For crypto, regulators may treat incidents like this as evidence in support of tighter controls on privacy coins.
Do you think privacy coins will be regulated more strictly? Let’s discuss in the comments.
[👉 门罗币赎金这事，群里聊](https://app.binance.com/uni-qr/TdcVf6Ho)
Last week, a gang that used fake government emails to trick clients into handing over their information has changed its price 🔒
They demanded $3 million from Revolut, specifying Monero as the payment currency.
The price dropped from a higher figure, and they gave a deadline of 24 hours. If they couldn’t reach a deal, they would sell the client files in batches.
The main targets are users with larger holdings of crypto assets, with around 680 files involved.
Inside are passports, bank account numbers, and a section listing Bitcoin holdings.
Switching to Monero is quite particular. The Bitcoin transfer path is publicly traceable.
Monero obscures the trail, making investigations completely different in difficulty.
For fintech companies, what they store for users isn’t just cash, but also on-chain asset records.
After the data leak, phishing emails are tailored precisely to the details of a user’s holdings.
For crypto, regulators may treat incidents like this as evidence in support of tighter controls on privacy coins.
Do you think privacy coins will be regulated more strictly? Let’s discuss in the comments.
