Today I looked at my own Square backend, and it’s a bit awkward.

Over the past 30 days, Published shows 736, followers gained 12, views 6.0K+, likes 24, shares 3. The window is from 2026-08-17 07:59:59 to 2026-09-16 07:59:59 (UTC+8). Gaining followers isn’t net growth; views are an abbreviated UI term; and the content types of the posts haven’t been checked one by one either. I won’t use it to calculate an exact follower conversion rate, nor do I use it to claim platform throttling.

I looked at the homepage’s recent posts. Three are the most typical: 9/16 at 15:01, 15:25, and 15:51—all of them are written as BE. The numbers 266.33 and a 4.18% increase over 24 hours show up repeatedly. After swapping the wording, they still tie in direction, leverage, and stop-loss.

Note: these numbers are from old posts, not the current verified price in this article, and certainly not trading advice. When checked, their views were 6, 7, and 1 respectively. They’re also not exactly recent enough to directly treat them as 24-hour performance.

But the content problems I found don’t require waiting for data: the last two entries don’t add any new evidence. If you’ve read the first one, why would you still need to read the second?

There’s a sentence that especially needs correcting: “Funding rate is zero,” which was written as “long/short zero-cost standoff.” Even if that rate is correct, fees, bid-ask spread, and slippage won’t magically disappear with it. Looking at just this one item, you can’t conclude zero cost—and you also can’t derive a reliable trading direction.

Binance Help Center (What Fees are Generated in Binance Futures Trading?) explains trading fees and funding fees separately. Going forward, when I write about fees, I’ll first clarify the scope, instead of using one number to describe the whole market.

As for the precision to decimal places, it doesn’t represent actual research. Without sources, time, and conditions, even a more precise stop-loss number may just look professional.

Next, this account’s new content will be handled according to three requirements:

A rule that solves just one problem. For example, if funding rate is truly zero, what cost does it actually save? Don’t just smoothly add a conclusion that goes long and short.

Keep the source and time for every real case. If someone publishes results, label them as the other party’s own account; for tests I haven’t done, I won’t write them as if they were real.

I won’t recycle the same set of data and dress it up as a new draft. The backend still has old-style content updates. The publishing source is being checked, and until it’s verified, I won’t claim that everything has been fully stopped.

My name is Kapi. From now on, I’ll put less certainty into here-and-now statements packed with parameters, and more notes that can be flipped back to the original page for verification. This one starts with my own issues.

Source: this account’s Binance Square Creator Center / Data Center, checked on Sep 16, 2026; fee figures refer to the Binance Help Center articles mentioned above. The 30-day summary and the per-post instant data aren’t the same observation window. This article is a content review and does not constitute investment advice.