Binance Square
橙子Joyce
319 Posts

橙子Joyce

Square Verified+
十年以上美股市场投研策略|WEB3项目投研|BTC.ETH.BNB.SOL|贵金属投资策略黄金.白银.铜|中长期价值投资者|推特X:@Joyce88AI
SOL Holder
SOL Holder
Frequent Trader
8.7 Years
803 Following
34.8K+ Followers
43.0K+ Liked
Posts
PINNED
·
--
Bullish
Verified
【Federal Reserve Raises Rates for the First Time in Three Years】The Federal Reserve raised rates by 25 basis points, lifting the benchmark rate to 3.75%-4.00%. This is the first rate hike since July 2023 and is in line with market expectations. Previously, the Fed had held steady for five consecutive meetings. U.S. Sep 16 Fed interest rate decision (upper limit) 4%, forecast 4%, previous 3.75%. U.S. Sep 17 reserve balance interest rate 3.9%, forecast 3.9%, previous 3.65%. The Fed dot plot median indicates one more rate hike in 2026. Fed FOMC statement: All members agreed on this rate decision. (The previous meeting was 9-3.) Fed FOMC statement: The rate hike will support inflation returning to the 2% target “in a more timely manner.” Fed FOMC economic projections: The median forecast for the federal funds rate at end-2026 is 4.1%. (June forecast was 3.8%.) Fed FOMC statement: Inflation remains elevated. Fed FOMC statement: Economic activity is expanding at a steady pace. The Fed hiked rates by 25 basis points; spot gold fell by more than $50 in the short term, now at $4,317.65 per ounce. Fed dot plot forecasts show that among 18 officials, 12 expect one more 25-basis-point hike this year; 4 expect two more hikes; and 2 expect no further hikes. Fed FOMC economic projections: The median forecasts for GDP growth from 2026 to 2028 are 2.3%, 2.4%, and 2.2%, respectively. (Previously expected were 2.2%, 2.3%, and 2.2%.) Fed FOMC economic projections: The median forecast for core CPI is 3.4% in 2026 and 2.5% in 2027. The U.S. dollar index (DXY) rises about 40 points in the short term, now at 99.81. Fed FOMC economic projections: The median forecasts for the unemployment rate from 2026 to 2028 are 4.1%, 4.1%, and 4.1%, respectively. (June forecasts were 4.3%, 4.3%, and 4.2%.) Fed FOMC economic projections: The median unemployment rate forecast for 2029 is 4.1%. Fed FOMC statement: Productivity growth is strong, and capital investment is steady. Fed FOMC economic projections: The median forecast for PCE inflation from 2026 to 2028 is 3.7%, 2.3%, and 2.1%, respectively. (June forecasts were 3.6%, 2.3%, and 2%.) The market has fully priced in another 25-basis-point rate hike by year-end, which is broadly consistent with the situation before the decision was released. $SPCX.US {stock_us}(SPCX.US) $NVDA.US {stock_us}(NVDA.US)
【Federal Reserve Raises Rates for the First Time in Three Years】The Federal Reserve raised rates by 25 basis points, lifting the benchmark rate to 3.75%-4.00%. This is the first rate hike since July 2023 and is in line with market expectations. Previously, the Fed had held steady for five consecutive meetings.

U.S. Sep 16 Fed interest rate decision (upper limit) 4%, forecast 4%, previous 3.75%.

U.S. Sep 17 reserve balance interest rate 3.9%, forecast 3.9%, previous 3.65%.

The Fed dot plot median indicates one more rate hike in 2026. Fed FOMC statement: All members agreed on this rate decision. (The previous meeting was 9-3.) Fed FOMC statement: The rate hike will support inflation returning to the 2% target “in a more timely manner.”

Fed FOMC economic projections: The median forecast for the federal funds rate at end-2026 is 4.1%. (June forecast was 3.8%.)

Fed FOMC statement: Inflation remains elevated.

Fed FOMC statement: Economic activity is expanding at a steady pace.

The Fed hiked rates by 25 basis points; spot gold fell by more than $50 in the short term, now at $4,317.65 per ounce.

Fed dot plot forecasts show that among 18 officials, 12 expect one more 25-basis-point hike this year; 4 expect two more hikes; and 2 expect no further hikes.

Fed FOMC economic projections: The median forecasts for GDP growth from 2026 to 2028 are 2.3%, 2.4%, and 2.2%, respectively. (Previously expected were 2.2%, 2.3%, and 2.2%.)

Fed FOMC economic projections: The median forecast for core CPI is 3.4% in 2026 and 2.5% in 2027.

The U.S. dollar index (DXY) rises about 40 points in the short term, now at 99.81.

Fed FOMC economic projections: The median forecasts for the unemployment rate from 2026 to 2028 are 4.1%, 4.1%, and 4.1%, respectively. (June forecasts were 4.3%, 4.3%, and 4.2%.)

Fed FOMC economic projections: The median unemployment rate forecast for 2029 is 4.1%.

Fed FOMC statement: Productivity growth is strong, and capital investment is steady.

Fed FOMC economic projections: The median forecast for PCE inflation from 2026 to 2028 is 3.7%, 2.3%, and 2.1%, respectively. (June forecasts were 3.6%, 2.3%, and 2%.)

The market has fully priced in another 25-basis-point rate hike by year-end, which is broadly consistent with the situation before the decision was released.
$SPCX.US
$NVDA.US
NVDAUS+0.35%
SPCXUS+0.22%
PINNED
·
--
Bullish
Verified
Will the Federal Reserve raise rates as expected this week? Wall Street is debating: will it end the U.S. stock bull market? After an unexpectedly strong U.S. CPI report came out last Friday, traders generally expect the Federal Reserve to begin raising rates at this week’s policy meeting—marking the first rate hike in more than three years. Historically, previous rounds of rate hikes have offered a reference point for today’s market. Based on past experience (though history of course can’t guarantee the future), U.S. stocks may first weaken, then rebound. Among the six tightening cycles since 1994, during the first four months after the rate-hike cycle began, the S&P 500’s average return was negative. This suggests that once the “rate-hike shoe” drops, U.S. stocks may look lackluster through the beginning of next year. As of the close last Friday, the benchmark U.S. equity index, the S&P 500, is up nearly 12% year to date. Strong corporate earnings and a fairly resilient economy have provided solid support for bulls in the stock market. If you extend the time horizon, the S&P 500’s performance tends to improve gradually: in the 12 months after the start of a rate-hiking cycle, the index’s average return is close to 7%, with a median return of about 11%. (Using median-based statistics helps remove distortions from extreme outliers—for example, the index surged more than 40% after hikes began in March 1997.) If the Federal Reserve implements a rate hike this Wednesday, it will be the first hike since July 2023—when the Fed raised rates to a range of 5.25% to 5.50%. Currently, the federal funds rate in the U.S. is at 3.50% to 3.75%. According to the CME Group’s FedWatch tool, futures traders currently assign an 86% probability to a 25-basis-point hike this week. One positive factor for the market is that mega-scale cloud service providers are still driving growth in excess returns through large-scale AI spending. The S&P 500 component stocks’ forecast for earnings growth in 2027 is expected to reach double digits. If the outlook for AI spending remains unchanged, it may be enough to offset any cooling in optimistic sentiment caused by the rate hikes. Another bright spot for equities is that although inflation remains sticky, it appears to be slowing. The inflation rate has fallen from a May peak of 4.2%. This should allow the Federal Reserve to take a more gradual approach, and the data shows that the pace of rate hikes is crucial for stock performance—slower pacing gives investors more time to absorb policy changes! $BZ {future}(BZUSDT) $CL {future}(CLUSDT) Energy
Will the Federal Reserve raise rates as expected this week? Wall Street is debating: will it end the U.S. stock bull market?

After an unexpectedly strong U.S. CPI report came out last Friday, traders generally expect the Federal Reserve to begin raising rates at this week’s policy meeting—marking the first rate hike in more than three years.

Historically, previous rounds of rate hikes have offered a reference point for today’s market. Based on past experience (though history of course can’t guarantee the future), U.S. stocks may first weaken, then rebound.

Among the six tightening cycles since 1994, during the first four months after the rate-hike cycle began, the S&P 500’s average return was negative.

This suggests that once the “rate-hike shoe” drops, U.S. stocks may look lackluster through the beginning of next year.

As of the close last Friday, the benchmark U.S. equity index, the S&P 500, is up nearly 12% year to date. Strong corporate earnings and a fairly resilient economy have provided solid support for bulls in the stock market.

If you extend the time horizon, the S&P 500’s performance tends to improve gradually: in the 12 months after the start of a rate-hiking cycle, the index’s average return is close to 7%, with a median return of about 11%. (Using median-based statistics helps remove distortions from extreme outliers—for example, the index surged more than 40% after hikes began in March 1997.)

If the Federal Reserve implements a rate hike this Wednesday, it will be the first hike since July 2023—when the Fed raised rates to a range of 5.25% to 5.50%.

Currently, the federal funds rate in the U.S. is at 3.50% to 3.75%. According to the CME Group’s FedWatch tool, futures traders currently assign an 86% probability to a 25-basis-point hike this week.

One positive factor for the market is that mega-scale cloud service providers are still driving growth in excess returns through large-scale AI spending. The S&P 500 component stocks’ forecast for earnings growth in 2027 is expected to reach double digits. If the outlook for AI spending remains unchanged, it may be enough to offset any cooling in optimistic sentiment caused by the rate hikes.

Another bright spot for equities is that although inflation remains sticky, it appears to be slowing. The inflation rate has fallen from a May peak of 4.2%. This should allow the Federal Reserve to take a more gradual approach, and the data shows that the pace of rate hikes is crucial for stock performance—slower pacing gives investors more time to absorb policy changes!
$BZ
$CL
Energy
圣克斯Lucky1688
·
--
🧧🔥🧧🔥🧧🔥 The recent market action is genuinely a back-and-forth probing. Here are 3 supporting indicators to help you verify a true breakout:
Spot CVD (Cumulative Volume Delta): Check whether the breakout is driven by spot active buying or by leveraged futures. If spot CVD and the contract price both make new highs at the same time, the odds of a real breakout are extremely high. If only the contracts pump while spot CVD stays flat, it’s often a false breakout.
SR-Flip (Resistance-to-Support confirmation): After a breakout, wait for the first pullback on the 5M/15M timeframe. If, when price retests the prior high resistance zone, it shows reduced volume and does not break down, it confirms that resistance has successfully flipped into support—an excellent right-side entry point with relatively low risk.
Liquidation Heatmap: If a large short liquidation pool (Liquidation Pool) has accumulated above key highs, then after price pierces through that area, if OI drops sharply, it indicates the liquidation has been completed and short-term momentum has largely been exhausted.
Follow me—answer 1 and take the $SOL red envelope.
🧧🔥🧧🔥🧧🔥
Mira小白桃
·
--
Crude Oil Rises—Why Is Gold Under Pressure Instead?

Recently, the market has been influenced at the same time by geopolitical risks, energy prices, and expectations for Federal Reserve policy.

At present, Brent crude is around $107, while WTI is around $105. Oil prices have remained at elevated levels. What the market is most worried about is not crude oil itself, but its impact on inflation expectations.

The logic is simple:

Oil prices rise → inflation pressure increases → the Fed’s room to cut rates is constrained → U.S. Treasury yields rise → gold comes under pressure.

So right now, gold is being pulled by two forces:

On one hand, safe-haven demand driven by geopolitical conditions supports gold;

On the other hand, higher oil prices boost inflation and rate-expectation pressures that suppress gold.

That’s also why you can’t simply understand it as:

“Geopolitical risk rises = gold must rise.”

In reality, gold’s short-term price action still depends on the U.S. dollar and U.S. Treasury yields.

Currently, the 10-year Treasury yield is already around 5%. If yields continue to move higher, gold’s short-term downside pressure could increase further.

Next, I will focus on three variables:

First, crude oil.

If oil prices keep rising quickly, inflation expectations may heat up further.

Second, Treasury yields.

If the 10-year yield keeps moving higher, gold may continue to be weighed down.

Third, the Federal Reserve.

Today’s FOMC rate decision is only the first step; more important is the policy guidance/signals after the meeting.

If the Fed releases more hawkish signals:

A stronger dollar and firmer yields → gold faces pressure.

If the policy statement is not as hawkish as the market expected:

Yields fall back → gold receives support.

So my view on gold now won’t be based solely on geopolitical news.

Crude oil determines inflation expectations, interest rates determine the cost of capital, and risk-off/safe-haven sentiment determines how much support is underneath gold.

Only when all three factors move at the same time is the key to understanding this round of the gold market.
$XAU

$CL

$BZ
晚风Vesper_1688
·
--
☀️A gentle morning breeze through the forest opens a brand-new chapter of the morning 🌿

Morning jogging is a discipline of the mind, and trading is also a form of practice 📊.
A long journey is won by steady progress; there’s no need to sprint all at once.
Market fluctuations are like the scenery along the road—steady at times, and occasionally demanding 🕊️.
Hold your rhythm, stay clear-headed, and don’t let short-term gains or losses pull you around ✨.
Keep persisting and refining yourself—opportunities will surely arrive on time 💎.

To fellow travelers: keep your love at heart, and walk with ease ❤️

#交易心理

#美联储加息是否已成定局

#1688家族family
长得帅不如跑的快1688
·
--
🚨 How much will a 25BP Fed hike really hurt Bitcoin?

The basic logic is simple:

Higher rates → Stronger USD → Tighter liquidity → Pressure on BTC.

But this time is different.

The market has already priced in much of the hike.

So the bigger question isn’t:

“Will the Fed hike?”

It’s:

“WILL THEY KEEP HIKING?”

🟢 ONE & DONE

If the Fed signals this is a one-off move, we could see:

Bad news delivered → BTC rebounds.

🔴 MORE HIKES

If the Fed signals additional hikes, markets may need to reprice the entire rate path.

That’s the bigger risk for $BTC.

So tonight I’m not focused on the 25BP itself.

I’m watching:

CAN BITCOIN HOLD AFTER THE HIKE?

If bad news hits and BTC still refuses to fall…

that’s a signal worth watching.

👇 Your call?

RELIEF RALLY 🟢 / MORE DOWNSIDE 🔴

#BTC #ETH #BNB
灼见
·
--
🚨 The Fed rate hike—is it already a done deal?

Now, the market’s answer is already very close:

YES.

The latest market pricing shows the probability of the Fed hiking rates by 25BP today has reached over 90%.

If it happens, the target range for the Federal Funds rate will move from:

3.50%–3.75%

to:

3.75%–4.00%

But I think what Crypto truly needs to focus on today is no longer:

“Will the Fed hike or not?”

Because when an event is already priced in by more than 90%,

what usually creates volatility is—

something unexpected.

There are three possible scenarios:

🟡 Scenario 1: Hike 25BP, but Warsh is more dovish

If the Fed tells the market:

“This is just a policy adjustment; it doesn’t mean a new sequence of consecutive hikes has started.”

Then you could see a very interesting move:

The risk assets could actually rise after the hike is implemented.

Reason is simple:

Everyone already knew they were going to hike.



🔴 Scenario 2: Hike 25BP + clearly signals more hikes ahead

This could be the real source of pressure.

Because the market won’t just be trading a single 25BP move anymore;

it becomes:

NEW HIKING CYCLE?

The U.S. dollar, Treasury yields, and global liquidity will all be repriced.

That’s the real stress test for $BTC, $ETH, and $BNB.



🟢 Scenario 3: An unexpected no-hike

The probability is low, but precisely because it’s low,

if it happens, the market reaction could be the biggest.

The dollar could drop quickly,

and risk assets could see intense volatility.



So tonight,

I won’t just be watching the news headline:

“FED +25BP”

What I’m really watching are a few words from Warsh’s press conference:

ONE-OFF?

Or:

MORE HIKES AHEAD?

Because for Crypto,

one already Price In 25BP may not be the most terrifying part.

What matters most is:

Today is it just a single rate hike,

or the start of a new hiking cycle?

If the market ultimately finds that—

“It’s only this one time.”

Then tonight’s biggest surprise might not be the hike.

Instead, it could be:

After the hike, BTC still can’t drop.

👇 What do you think about tonight’s Fed?

Hike and stop once 🟢 / Keep hiking 🔴

#BTC #ETH #BNB
oO小蝦米對抗大鯨魚Oo
·
--
🥊 Cryptocurrency News Roundup 📊 U.S. 《#CLARITY Act》

The Digital Assets Market Structure Act failed to advance during the Senate procedural vote on September 15, 2026. This event has indeed affected the crypto market, and the impact is not only about “how much it dropped today.” More importantly, uncertainty about the future regulatory direction for the U.S. crypto industry has risen again.
On September 15, the Senate vote result was 49 in favor and 50 against, failing to reach the 60-vote threshold required to advance, so the bill has been temporarily stalled. Reuters reported that even some Republican senators joined the opposition.

🚩 Reasons it was not passed:
Based on currently available public reports, it’s not simply a matter of “Democrats being anti-crypto” or “Republicans supporting crypto.”
There are at least three key conflicts.

① Democrats want stronger conflicts-of-interest / ethics restrictions
This is one of the most important obstacles in this round of negotiations.
Democrats have concerns about the Trump family and their related crypto asset interests, and want to add stricter ethics and conflicts-of-interest rules—such as limiting federal officials from using public office to promote or issue related digital assets.
AP reported that Democrats are requesting stronger safeguards, including stricter requirements for handling relevant assets held by the President that exceed certain thresholds.

② Democrats believe the original version is too friendly to the Crypto Industry
Some Democratic lawmakers think the CLARITY Act still provides a regulatory environment that is too lenient for the crypto industry.

③ Republicans are also not fully in agreement—something many people may overlook.
This isn’t “all Republicans support it and all Democrats oppose it.”
Reuters reported that in the end, some Republican senators voted against the bill, preventing it from reaching the 60-vote threshold.

$BTC

$ETH
·
--
Bullish
Verified
The U.S. military for the first time publicly confirmed that the country now has space-based “space control weapons” in orbit, and that the “Iron Dome” space-based interceptor project has advanced to the “flight-ready hardware” stage. U.S. Air Force Secretary Troy M. (Troy Meinke) said on Monday: “The United States now has in-orbit space control weapons that can protect U.S. forces from attacks by hostile forces,” adding, “From a deterrence standpoint, this is important.” Meinke did not specify the type of the space-based weapon. Reports said this was the first time the U.S. acknowledged that it has “offensive capabilities” in space. On Tuesday, Douglas Hiss, commander of the U.S. Space Force, further confirmed that soldiers of the space forces have been operating “in-orbit weapons capable of withstanding attacks in space.” Richard Palmer, director of the Space Command’s office for capabilities and resources integration, also said on Tuesday that the public disclosure of these capabilities is intended to deter adversaries while demonstrating that the United States is prepared to respond. Palmer said, “Our joint forces and our allies need space, and our economy needs space. The United States is ready to uphold this.” On Monday, Meinke revealed that the “Iron Dome” space-based interceptor project “advanced from the initial contract stage to flight-ready hardware in less than a year.” According to reports, in May last year, U.S. President Donald Trump issued a development plan for the “Iron Dome” missile defense system. Trump said that “Iron Dome” would be integrated with the United States’ existing missile defense capabilities, and once fully built, it could intercept missiles launched from other places in the world and even from space. The entire system is expected to cost about $175 billion (USD), and is planned to be “fully operational” within three years. ———————————————————————— $Space concept stocks $SPCX.US {stock_us}(SPCX.US) $LMT.US {stock_us}(LMT.US) $RTX.US {stock_us}(RTX.US)
The U.S. military for the first time publicly confirmed that the country now has space-based “space control weapons” in orbit, and that the “Iron Dome” space-based interceptor project has advanced to the “flight-ready hardware” stage.

U.S. Air Force Secretary Troy M. (Troy Meinke) said on Monday: “The United States now has in-orbit space control weapons that can protect U.S. forces from attacks by hostile forces,” adding, “From a deterrence standpoint, this is important.” Meinke did not specify the type of the space-based weapon. Reports said this was the first time the U.S. acknowledged that it has “offensive capabilities” in space.

On Tuesday, Douglas Hiss, commander of the U.S. Space Force, further confirmed that soldiers of the space forces have been operating “in-orbit weapons capable of withstanding attacks in space.” Richard Palmer, director of the Space Command’s office for capabilities and resources integration, also said on Tuesday that the public disclosure of these capabilities is intended to deter adversaries while demonstrating that the United States is prepared to respond. Palmer said, “Our joint forces and our allies need space, and our economy needs space. The United States is ready to uphold this.”

On Monday, Meinke revealed that the “Iron Dome” space-based interceptor project “advanced from the initial contract stage to flight-ready hardware in less than a year.”

According to reports, in May last year, U.S. President Donald Trump issued a development plan for the “Iron Dome” missile defense system. Trump said that “Iron Dome” would be integrated with the United States’ existing missile defense capabilities, and once fully built, it could intercept missiles launched from other places in the world and even from space. The entire system is expected to cost about $175 billion (USD), and is planned to be “fully operational” within three years.

————————————————————————
$Space concept stocks
$SPCX.US

$LMT.US
$RTX.US
LMTUS+0.19%
RTXUS+0.03%
SPCXUS+0.22%
🎙️ The Clear Bill is temporarily not passed, and there isn’t much movement in the market either
avatar
End
02 h 03 m 12 s
7k
12
14
🎙️ BNB and DCA Investment and Talk About Encryption Legislation
cover
End
02 h 41 m 14 s
5.5k
13
18
🎙️ Crypto market updates and community Q&A; Answering newcomers’ questions ✅ Keep building the community 🦅 Spread the philosophy of freedom! Maintain ecological balance!
avatar
End
03 h 26 m 35 s
13k
27
64
🎙️ So boring market. This market again needs a hotspot, BNB
cover
End
02 h 06 m 41 s
6.8k
28
24
Verified
The Fed’s decision is about to be released, and the market is pricing a higher chance of a rate hike, up to 94% Interest rate swaps linked to the Federal Reserve meeting show that the market expects the probability of this rate hike at about 94%, implying that roughly 23 basis points of tightening have already been priced in. If the hike happens as scheduled, the federal funds rate range will rise to 3.75%–4%. If the Fed keeps rates unchanged, it could become the biggest “dovish surprise” at a routine meeting since the Fed began formally publishing its policy decisions in 1994. Hassett said that both he and U.S. President Donald Trump “respect whatever the Fed decides to do, no matter what it is.” In an interview on Tuesday, Hassett, director of the White House National Economic Council, outlined reasons why the Fed should not raise rates, but also said, “we” respect whatever decision the Fed will make. Last Sunday, Hassett made a similar remark, saying that both Trump and he believe there is no reason to hike rates, but he would support 100% any decision the Fed makes, and that Trump respects Powell and the Fed’s independence. It is important for the Fed to maintain the status quo ahead of the election. Meanwhile, the market has started to reassess the AI-driven stock rally, while also absorbing the impact of rising oil prices and the possibility of a rate hike by the Fed this week. ————————————————————————— Only the stock prices of international large corporations are the real opportunities—we will patiently wait for prices to pull back! $NVDA.US {stock_us}(NVDA.US) $META.US {stock_us}(META.US)
The Fed’s decision is about to be released, and the market is pricing a higher chance of a rate hike, up to 94%

Interest rate swaps linked to the Federal Reserve meeting show that the market expects the probability of this rate hike at about 94%, implying that roughly 23 basis points of tightening have already been priced in. If the hike happens as scheduled, the federal funds rate range will rise to 3.75%–4%. If the Fed keeps rates unchanged, it could become the biggest “dovish surprise” at a routine meeting since the Fed began formally publishing its policy decisions in 1994.

Hassett said that both he and U.S. President Donald Trump “respect whatever the Fed decides to do, no matter what it is.” In an interview on Tuesday, Hassett, director of the White House National Economic Council, outlined reasons why the Fed should not raise rates, but also said, “we” respect whatever decision the Fed will make. Last Sunday, Hassett made a similar remark, saying that both Trump and he believe there is no reason to hike rates, but he would support 100% any decision the Fed makes, and that Trump respects Powell and the Fed’s independence. It is important for the Fed to maintain the status quo ahead of the election.

Meanwhile, the market has started to reassess the AI-driven stock rally, while also absorbing the impact of rising oil prices and the possibility of a rate hike by the Fed this week.
—————————————————————————
Only the stock prices of international large corporations are the real opportunities—we will patiently wait for prices to pull back!
$NVDA.US
$META.US
METAUS+0.14%
NVDAUS+0.35%
Landmark bill rejected, crypto market faces major negative pressure. On September 15 in Eastern Time, the U.S. Senate voted to block the advancement of the “Clarity Act” (the Digital Asset Market Structure Clarity Act). This dealt a significant blow to the crypto industry’s efforts to establish a comprehensive market-structure framework. The final vote was 50 in favor and 49 against—far below the 60 votes required to overcome procedural obstacles. Although the bill went through more than a year of negotiations, the two parties ultimately failed to bridge their differences on key provisions. A major reason cited by Democratic lawmakers is the bill’s ongoing controversy over conflict-of-interest provisions involving Trump’s cryptocurrency business interests. The bill would create a major loophole in nearly a century of securities laws—allowing non-crypto companies to put assets on-chain to evade investor protections, and enabling banks to use customer deposits for crypto lending, trading derivatives, operating nodes, and selling related software. The bill aims to provide a clearer regulatory framework for banks, broker-dealers, and asset management institutions to participate in digital-asset trading and product development, and is widely seen as the most systematic attempt at crypto legislation in recent years. The bill’s failure to pass further prolongs a regulatory vacuum in the crypto market, leaving the industry with greater uncertainty in areas such as compliance pathways, capital allocation, and institutionalization timelines. The failure of this vote may mean the crypto industry will have to wait until next year for clearer rules. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) are already moving forward with rulemaking in the digital-asset space. Even if Congress does not pass a clarity bill, those rules will still provide guidance for investment institutions. The fundamentals of the crypto industry are stronger than ever. Billions of dollars of capital are moving on-chain; leading payment companies and financial institutions are adopting blockchain technology; and entrepreneurs around the world continue to develop new financial products—driving capital into the internet era. We will continue to work toward establishing clear regulatory rules that both protect consumers and provide room for innovation and building for entrepreneurs. 😁 It’s a wise move to invest regularly in BTC, ETH, BNB, and SOL! $BTC {future}(BTCUSDT) $BNB {future}(BNBUSDT)
Landmark bill rejected, crypto market faces major negative pressure.

On September 15 in Eastern Time, the U.S. Senate voted to block the advancement of the “Clarity Act” (the Digital Asset Market Structure Clarity Act). This dealt a significant blow to the crypto industry’s efforts to establish a comprehensive market-structure framework. The final vote was 50 in favor and 49 against—far below the 60 votes required to overcome procedural obstacles.

Although the bill went through more than a year of negotiations, the two parties ultimately failed to bridge their differences on key provisions. A major reason cited by Democratic lawmakers is the bill’s ongoing controversy over conflict-of-interest provisions involving Trump’s cryptocurrency business interests. The bill would create a major loophole in nearly a century of securities laws—allowing non-crypto companies to put assets on-chain to evade investor protections, and enabling banks to use customer deposits for crypto lending, trading derivatives, operating nodes, and selling related software.

The bill aims to provide a clearer regulatory framework for banks, broker-dealers, and asset management institutions to participate in digital-asset trading and product development, and is widely seen as the most systematic attempt at crypto legislation in recent years.

The bill’s failure to pass further prolongs a regulatory vacuum in the crypto market, leaving the industry with greater uncertainty in areas such as compliance pathways, capital allocation, and institutionalization timelines.

The failure of this vote may mean the crypto industry will have to wait until next year for clearer rules.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) are already moving forward with rulemaking in the digital-asset space. Even if Congress does not pass a clarity bill, those rules will still provide guidance for investment institutions.

The fundamentals of the crypto industry are stronger than ever. Billions of dollars of capital are moving on-chain; leading payment companies and financial institutions are adopting blockchain technology; and entrepreneurs around the world continue to develop new financial products—driving capital into the internet era. We will continue to work toward establishing clear regulatory rules that both protect consumers and provide room for innovation and building for entrepreneurs.

😁 It’s a wise move to invest regularly in BTC, ETH, BNB, and SOL!
$BTC

$BNB
🎙️ How’s the market looking today?
avatar
End
02 h 12 m 17 s
8.1k
14
10
·
--
Bullish
Apple continues to expand iPhone’s satellite communication capabilities, while SpaceX is advancing direct-to-cell phone connectivity to low-Earth orbit satellites through Starlink. The industry scale is expanding accordingly. As of the end of June this year, 123 satellite direct-to-mobile collaborations between satellite operators and mobile carriers have been publicly disclosed worldwide, with 23 already launched. Starlink alone involves 99 partnerships. While direct-to-satellite connectivity on phones is still in the technical validation stage, the main question is who will connect first and who will get calls through first. As more players enter the scene, another issue begins to emerge: if, in the future, carriers in different countries all want to increase satellite coverage, does every carrier behind the scenes need to build its own independent satellite network? SpaceX currently represents a highly vertically integrated approach: it controls rockets, satellites, and the network itself, then partners with carriers in various countries. It is trying to spin off parts of the infrastructure in satellite communications so that multiple carriers can share them. Which model is lower-cost and more efficient is still unclear. But the fact that these two paths are emerging at the same time already indicates that direct-to-phone satellite connectivity is shifting from a simple technological race to a more complex industrial contest. More than 200 years ago, in The Wealth of Nations, the discussion focused on why pin-making needs division of labor. Today’s question is about satellites. When a market becomes large enough, which capabilities should still remain in the hands of a single company, and which infrastructure is better suited to be used jointly by many? Steady and continuous investing $SPCX.US $SPCX {future}(SPCXUSDT)
Apple continues to expand iPhone’s satellite communication capabilities, while SpaceX is advancing direct-to-cell phone connectivity to low-Earth orbit satellites through Starlink.

The industry scale is expanding accordingly. As of the end of June this year, 123 satellite direct-to-mobile collaborations between satellite operators and mobile carriers have been publicly disclosed worldwide, with 23 already launched. Starlink alone involves 99 partnerships.

While direct-to-satellite connectivity on phones is still in the technical validation stage, the main question is who will connect first and who will get calls through first. As more players enter the scene, another issue begins to emerge: if, in the future, carriers in different countries all want to increase satellite coverage, does every carrier behind the scenes need to build its own independent satellite network?

SpaceX currently represents a highly vertically integrated approach: it controls rockets, satellites, and the network itself, then partners with carriers in various countries.

It is trying to spin off parts of the infrastructure in satellite communications so that multiple carriers can share them.

Which model is lower-cost and more efficient is still unclear. But the fact that these two paths are emerging at the same time already indicates that direct-to-phone satellite connectivity is shifting from a simple technological race to a more complex industrial contest.

More than 200 years ago, in The Wealth of Nations, the discussion focused on why pin-making needs division of labor.

Today’s question is about satellites.
When a market becomes large enough, which capabilities should still remain in the hands of a single company, and which infrastructure is better suited to be used jointly by many?
Steady and continuous investing $SPCX.US
$SPCX
SPCXUS+0.22%
🎙️ Build the BNB and Binance Square together
cover
End
03 h 06 m 34 s
6.2k
22
32
🎙️ Still waiting for the market update, calmly wait for the market update bnb
cover
End
02 h 07 m 52 s
5.2k
22
21
🎙️ Maintain ecological balance and build Binance Plaza
cover
End
04 h 00 m 50 s
7.5k
32
100
Log in to explore more content
Join global crypto users on Binance Square
⚡️ Get latest and useful information about crypto.
💬 Trusted by the world’s largest crypto exchange.
👍 Discover real insights from verified creators.
Email / Phone number
Sitemap
Cookie Preferences
Platform T&Cs