If you missed ZEC’s move, there’s no need to regret it too much. You can take a look at the privacy sector’s second runner-up $DASH
When the leader’s price is too high, there’s no need to chase it aggressively. Going after the second runner-up for a catch-up rally is also a good choice;
The advantage of a catch-up rally is that the potential return may be higher. If the leader fully breaks out, the second runner-up’s acceleration can be astonishing.
Of course, the downside is also obvious: once the leader weakens, the second runner-up can dump at a speed beyond imagination; the risk of playing the second runner-up’s catch-up rally is greater.
To summarize simply: if you judge that the leader’s trend is not over yet, going for the second runner-up’s catch-up rally is a pretty cost-effective choice, similar to yesterday’s idea when I went long ASTER. If the leader’s momentum starts to fade, retreat immediately and don’t stay in the fight—that’s the right move.
Always remember that risk and reward are directly proportional
When the leader’s price is too high, there’s no need to chase it aggressively. Going after the second runner-up for a catch-up rally is also a good choice;
The advantage of a catch-up rally is that the potential return may be higher. If the leader fully breaks out, the second runner-up’s acceleration can be astonishing.
Of course, the downside is also obvious: once the leader weakens, the second runner-up can dump at a speed beyond imagination; the risk of playing the second runner-up’s catch-up rally is greater.
To summarize simply: if you judge that the leader’s trend is not over yet, going for the second runner-up’s catch-up rally is a pretty cost-effective choice, similar to yesterday’s idea when I went long ASTER. If the leader’s momentum starts to fade, retreat immediately and don’t stay in the fight—that’s the right move.
Always remember that risk and reward are directly proportional
