The biggest misjudgment by Sun Yuchen this time is that he hard-sells a civil dispute worth 30 million into a “man’s awakening.”
Should the 30 million be returned? Let the court hear the evidence.
“I have the right to recover the money” ≠ “I have the right to put my ex’s private life on X.”
And don’t gild exposed personal privacy with slogans like “men’s rights,” “bride price,” or “the costs of marriage.” Public issues can be discussed, but don’t use a specific woman as fuel.
Most ironically, Sun Yuchen has already filed the case in court, yet he goes online to hold a second “court”—turning hundreds of millions of netizens into jurors.
This isn’t rights protection; it’s mixing legal procedure with public-opinion trial.
If there’s real evidence, we’ll see each other in court.
If there’s real merit, you don’t need some short essay to win.
Whether the 30 million can ultimately be recovered—let the judgment decide.
As for who wins this battle of public opinion—
I only see one person who understands traffic best. For the first time, I’ve learned:
Traffic can be manufactured, but the conclusion has never been something you can control.
(ps: No wonder he claims a net worth of $6.5 billion, yet won’t come up with $50 million—turns out it’s also packaged. In fact, the readily available funds are only about $150 million. Asking him for $50 million—doesn’t that mean it’s basically asking for his life?!!!)
Should the 30 million be returned? Let the court hear the evidence.
“I have the right to recover the money” ≠ “I have the right to put my ex’s private life on X.”
And don’t gild exposed personal privacy with slogans like “men’s rights,” “bride price,” or “the costs of marriage.” Public issues can be discussed, but don’t use a specific woman as fuel.
Most ironically, Sun Yuchen has already filed the case in court, yet he goes online to hold a second “court”—turning hundreds of millions of netizens into jurors.
This isn’t rights protection; it’s mixing legal procedure with public-opinion trial.
If there’s real evidence, we’ll see each other in court.
If there’s real merit, you don’t need some short essay to win.
Whether the 30 million can ultimately be recovered—let the judgment decide.
As for who wins this battle of public opinion—
I only see one person who understands traffic best. For the first time, I’ve learned:
Traffic can be manufactured, but the conclusion has never been something you can control.
(ps: No wonder he claims a net worth of $6.5 billion, yet won’t come up with $50 million—turns out it’s also packaged. In fact, the readily available funds are only about $150 million. Asking him for $50 million—doesn’t that mean it’s basically asking for his life?!!!)
