Saylor is really angry this time đ„
MSCI is proposing a new rule: companies like Strategy, which hold âBitcoin-heavyâ portfolios, will be kicked out of the index. The reason? Theyâre allegedly more like âinvestment fundsâ rather than normal businesses.
Saylor went straight on the offensive: this is blatant discriminatory rulemaking.
This is worth a closer look đ
If a company holds $BTC as a reserve asset and thatâs enough to get removed from traditional indicesâthen what about the companies that have $100+ billion in cash on their balance sheets and heavy exposure to gold and real estate development? How are they categorized?
Put simply, the traditional financial rule system isnât ready to accept businesses built on a âBitcoin standard.â Strategy holds hundreds of thousands of BTC, and in essence itâs challenging the pricing power of the old world.
In the short term, being removed from the index will indeed affect how passive funds allocate capital. But look at it another wayâwhen old rules start targeting you specifically, it often means youâre already strong enough to make them uneasy.
History keeps proving this: new things are never accepted by old systems through âpermission.â Instead, they rewrite the rules by forcing change through strength.
BTC doesnât need an MSCI stamp of approvalâbut in the future, MSCI may not be able to avoid the companies that thrive in the BTC era.
This standoff is only just beginning âĄ
#BTC #Strategy #MichaelSaylor
MSCI is proposing a new rule: companies like Strategy, which hold âBitcoin-heavyâ portfolios, will be kicked out of the index. The reason? Theyâre allegedly more like âinvestment fundsâ rather than normal businesses.
Saylor went straight on the offensive: this is blatant discriminatory rulemaking.
This is worth a closer look đ
If a company holds $BTC as a reserve asset and thatâs enough to get removed from traditional indicesâthen what about the companies that have $100+ billion in cash on their balance sheets and heavy exposure to gold and real estate development? How are they categorized?
Put simply, the traditional financial rule system isnât ready to accept businesses built on a âBitcoin standard.â Strategy holds hundreds of thousands of BTC, and in essence itâs challenging the pricing power of the old world.
In the short term, being removed from the index will indeed affect how passive funds allocate capital. But look at it another wayâwhen old rules start targeting you specifically, it often means youâre already strong enough to make them uneasy.
History keeps proving this: new things are never accepted by old systems through âpermission.â Instead, they rewrite the rules by forcing change through strength.
BTC doesnât need an MSCI stamp of approvalâbut in the future, MSCI may not be able to avoid the companies that thrive in the BTC era.
This standoff is only just beginning âĄ
#BTC #Strategy #MichaelSaylor