Injective Mint caught my attention because tokenization is only half the problem.
Putting an asset onchain is easy. The harder part is enforcing who can hold it, transfer it, freeze it, or redeem it.
That’s where Injective’s approach gets interesting: the rules can become part of the asset infrastructure itself.
Add the POSCO International + LG CNS trade receivables tests, $6.8B+ in reported RWA volume, and Injective’s SEC-registered transfer agent, and the bigger picture starts to emerge.
This feels less like simply putting assets onchain and more like building rails for assets that actually need to operate onchain.
Mint is still in private beta, but I’ll be watching this closely. 🥷
@Injective_ $INJ
Putting an asset onchain is easy. The harder part is enforcing who can hold it, transfer it, freeze it, or redeem it.
That’s where Injective’s approach gets interesting: the rules can become part of the asset infrastructure itself.
Add the POSCO International + LG CNS trade receivables tests, $6.8B+ in reported RWA volume, and Injective’s SEC-registered transfer agent, and the bigger picture starts to emerge.
This feels less like simply putting assets onchain and more like building rails for assets that actually need to operate onchain.
Mint is still in private beta, but I’ll be watching this closely. 🥷
@Injective_ $INJ
