In Web3, there’s a “multiple-choice question” that has been troubling a lot of people.
It’s also one of the questions in various broker risk tests:
100% return, but there’s a chance you lose it all OR 10% return, but the drawdown is controllable
What do you choose？？？
This is like meme vs. spot.
With $10k, you can make $1M because it’s a meme—tenfold is not a dream.
With $1M, you can make $1M because it’s spot—doubling is not a dream.
A typical example is $Bull Lai: before it was listed, it was a meme; after it was listed, it became spot.
The kind of trading pattern you can observe is that after the listing, the big players directly smash down a few million dollars, but before the listing they only go in with a few thousand.
This multiple-choice question has kept troubling many people.
Even to this day, I myself sometimes still get bothered by it.
If I could thoroughly dissect this problem and find the answer that fits me, I’d probably truly make it to the shore.
It’s also one of the questions in various broker risk tests:
100% return, but there’s a chance you lose it all OR 10% return, but the drawdown is controllable
What do you choose？？？
This is like meme vs. spot.
With $10k, you can make $1M because it’s a meme—tenfold is not a dream.
With $1M, you can make $1M because it’s spot—doubling is not a dream.
A typical example is $Bull Lai: before it was listed, it was a meme; after it was listed, it became spot.
The kind of trading pattern you can observe is that after the listing, the big players directly smash down a few million dollars, but before the listing they only go in with a few thousand.
This multiple-choice question has kept troubling many people.
Even to this day, I myself sometimes still get bothered by it.
If I could thoroughly dissect this problem and find the answer that fits me, I’d probably truly make it to the shore.