$UAI This is interesting. I pulled it from 0.26 up to 0.377—its high was more than 40 points up. It’s not as wild as ZKC, but it moved steadily.
Smart money over there pretty much tells the whole story. 204 people are profitable, with an average price of 0.3128. They’re up 350k U, and 99% of them are making money. 156 people are losing, with an average price of 0.3105. They’re down 260k U, and the profit rate is only 0.64%. The two sides’ entry prices differ by just two li (0.002), yet the outcomes are worlds apart—this suggests that someone is accurately bottom-fishing around 0.31, while someone else chased right at the phase top. It’s completely different from how ZKC was back then: here, more people are profiting and positions are heavier among winners; meanwhile, fewer people are losing. The overall positioning/lot structure is much healthier.
The open interest has stayed stable around 26M and hasn’t really moved. The long-to-short ratio (by number of participants) is 1.21—far more rational than ZKC’s 3.38. At least we didn’t see retail investors blindly charging long. The fee rate is positive at 0.02%—bulls are paying. That’s the opposite of ZKC, where shorts got bled.
But RSI on the 4-hour timeframe has shot up to 96, even more absurd than ZKC. In the short term, it’s definitely overbought. However, on the daily timeframe RSI is only 55. On the bigger cycle view, maybe it’s just just waking up.
Market cap is 126 million, rank 142. It’s playing differently from ZKC’s tiny-cap, million-level setup. Historical high is 0.61; now it’s 0.377. There’s still room above, but it needs to digest in the short term.
I personally didn’t move on ZKC, and I didn’t chase UAI either—I’m just watching. Both of those spots feel awkward; I’ll consider it after a pullback.
#uai
Smart money over there pretty much tells the whole story. 204 people are profitable, with an average price of 0.3128. They’re up 350k U, and 99% of them are making money. 156 people are losing, with an average price of 0.3105. They’re down 260k U, and the profit rate is only 0.64%. The two sides’ entry prices differ by just two li (0.002), yet the outcomes are worlds apart—this suggests that someone is accurately bottom-fishing around 0.31, while someone else chased right at the phase top. It’s completely different from how ZKC was back then: here, more people are profiting and positions are heavier among winners; meanwhile, fewer people are losing. The overall positioning/lot structure is much healthier.
The open interest has stayed stable around 26M and hasn’t really moved. The long-to-short ratio (by number of participants) is 1.21—far more rational than ZKC’s 3.38. At least we didn’t see retail investors blindly charging long. The fee rate is positive at 0.02%—bulls are paying. That’s the opposite of ZKC, where shorts got bled.
But RSI on the 4-hour timeframe has shot up to 96, even more absurd than ZKC. In the short term, it’s definitely overbought. However, on the daily timeframe RSI is only 55. On the bigger cycle view, maybe it’s just just waking up.
Market cap is 126 million, rank 142. It’s playing differently from ZKC’s tiny-cap, million-level setup. Historical high is 0.61; now it’s 0.377. There’s still room above, but it needs to digest in the short term.
I personally didn’t move on ZKC, and I didn’t chase UAI either—I’m just watching. Both of those spots feel awkward; I’ll consider it after a pullback.
#uai