Binance Square
AbdullRauf
8.2k Posts

AbdullRauf

Square Verified
Hi Guys i am Spot trader specialist in Intra Daytrade, DCA and Swing trade. Follow me tostay updated about market and Binance reward Campaigns.
Open Trade
Frequent Trader
1.3 Years
1.1K+ Following
30.7K+ Followers
27.6K+ Liked
Posts
Portfolio
PINNED
·
--
YOUR SUPPORT = OUR THANKS. 2000 GIFTS, GO! 🚀🎁💐 Square Family, you rock! 🧧 To celebrate YOU, we’re giving away 2000 GIFTS. Let’s go! How to enter: 👉 Follow us 👉 Share this post 👉 Comment “666” Random draws. Huge wins. Enter now!
YOUR SUPPORT = OUR THANKS. 2000 GIFTS, GO! 🚀🎁💐
Square Family, you rock! 🧧 To celebrate YOU, we’re giving away 2000 GIFTS. Let’s go!
How to enter:
👉 Follow us
👉 Share this post
👉 Comment “666”
Random draws. Huge wins. Enter now!
Anuuonchain
Anuuonchain
ANUUONCHAIN
·
--
😍🥰😍🥰😍🥰😍🥰😍🥰😍🥰😍🥰😍
🥵🥵🥵🥵🥵🥵🥵🥵🥵🥵🥵🥵🥵🥵🥵
follow me please
🙌🙌🙌🙌😼😼😼😼😼😼😼😼😼😼😼
NVD
NVD
NVD Insights
·
--
Big Big Big chance to get free $DOGE
Drop "NVD"
go
go
龟龟财神到
·
--
Losing money isn’t scary—learn from the lesson and keep working hard💪
muzamil
muzamil
Muzamil Abbas⁷⁵ 穆扎米尔_阿巴斯
·
--
Bullish

🎁 $SHIB GIVEAWAY WORTH $100 🎁

I’m giving away SHIB Gift Boxes to 3,000 lucky people! 🐕🔥

To participate:

❤️ Like this post ✅
🔁 Repost this post ✅
💬 Comment “1” below ✅
🎁 Claim your Gift Box ✅

Good luck everyone🚀✨

#SHIB #Giveaway #Binance #CryptoGiveaway
jannat
jannat
JANNAT BM_
·
--
🎁🎁🎁 GIFT BOX 🎁🎁🎁🎁
Ahmed
Ahmed
Ahmed Ali Nizamani
·
--
666 + 666 = 🎁🎁🎁✨✨✨
zone
zone
Z O N E P R I M E
·
--
Bullish
🎉🎁 ZONE PRIME BTC SURPRISE DROP! 🎁🎉
✨ The Red Packet is full and ready to open! ✨

👇 Simple Steps to Participate 👇

❤️ Follow ZONE PRIME
🔁 Like & Share
💬 Comment “BTC”

🚀 Stay active for the next reward round!

#BTC #Crypto #ZONEPRIME #RedPacket #BİNANCE
raven
raven
Raven Hei 黑
·
--
🎁🧧 RED PACKET TIME! 🧧🎁

A little surprise can make someone’s day ❤️✨
Ready to grab your share? 👀🔥

💰 Open • Claim • Enjoy
🍀 Good luck everyone!

Who’s getting lucky today? 😍👇
#RedPacket #Crypto #Binance #Web3
Leo
Leo
Leo - F0
·
--
Bullish
🧧🧧🔥HAPPY SUNDAY FULL OF GİFTS FOR EVERYONE FROM DUBAİ!🔥🧧🧧

"Close the terminal and let the wallet grow. Chasing the high life only traders know."

$BTC 🔥🔥🧧🧧#Dubái
$BNB $ETH
#1688家族family 💚 @周周1688 @Hawk自由哥 #xrp #DOGE #Binance
elexa
elexa
E L E X A
·
--
🚨 LIVE NOW 🚨
Watching is easy… winning takes action 👀
Want free $USDT?
💬 Comment 666
❤️ Like
🔁 Share
➕ Follow
⏳ Spots are filling fast
Comment 666 now 🚀
#Crypto #USDT
Aria
Aria
Aria Bloom 阿莉娅
·
--
Bullish
Stay focused keep learning, and make every move with confidence. 🚀
The crypto journey is all about continuous learning, smart decisions and staying consistent. 💛
Let’s keep growing together with Binance.
#BinanceSquareTalks #cryptouniverseofficial $TUT $BTC

sheemm
sheemm
Sheemm
·
--
🎁🎁🎁 GOOD MORNING 🎁🎁🎁

LIKE REPOST COMMENT

AND CLAIM $BNB 🎁🎁🎁🎁

$MAGMA
$BTR
#XRPETFsBiggestWeeklyHaulOf2026
go
go
白鲨观点
·
--
Standing on the balcony, I smoked a cigarette as the sky slowly darkened, and the weekend was almost over again.

This week’s market was actually pretty lively. BTC surged from 75,000 to 80,000, then got dumped back down, only to rally again—big swings of several thousand points back and forth. Both sides, bulls and bears, had people getting liquidated. I scrolled through my朋友圈 (social feed). Some people were showing off profits, others cursing, and some pretending nothing happened. It was pretty much the same as every weekend.

I personally didn’t do much this week. I held spot, and with a small position I played two swings—just made enough for grocery money. In the past, with this kind of choppy, ranging market, I would definitely have jumped in every day, unable to sit still if I didn’t trade. But not anymore. I’m older now, more cautious. I know that some money isn’t meant to be earned by me.

A lot of people ask me how next week will go. Honestly, I don’t know.

After doing trading for so many years, I’ve become less and less willing to predict. You think you’ve understood the trend, and the market slaps you in the face in a second. You think it’s definitely going down, and it shows you otherwise by going up instead. In the end, you realize that being right a few times about the market isn’t that impressive. The real skill is being able to survive in this market for five or ten years.

As for what happens next week—let’s talk about it next week.

Tonight, have a good meal and go to bed early.

Tomorrow the market opens—another brand-new week.



#BinanceSquare #BTC #交易心得分享 #周末复盘
bilverse
bilverse
Bilverse
·
--
🧧 BNB RED PACKET GIVEAWAY 🎁🧧

I’M GIVING AWAY BNB TO MY BINANCE FOLLOWERS! 🟡

Want your share? It’s SUPER simple 👇

💬 Comment 999 below
🎁 Receive your BNB immediately!

No complicated steps. No waiting. Just 999 → BNB in your red packet. 🧧💰

🔥 If you’re seeing this, don’t miss it!

Click here to DOUBLE your Rewards! 🧧🚀

🚀 Let’s make this BNB giveaway HUGE!

#BNB #RedPacket #CryptoCommunity #Bilverse
$BMT Trading Tournament
$BMT Trading Tournament
Binance TG Community
·
--
BMT Trading Tournament: Trade to Share Up to 400 BNB Token Vouchers learn more here 😀💪

Binance is thrilled to launch a Bubblemaps (BMT) Trading Tournament where eligible users will have a chance to share a total prize pool of 400 BNB in token vouchers! 

In addition, Binance is introducing an “Sprint Reward” for a limited period – the more you trade, the higher your extra rewards!
$BMT
Verified
At first I assumed the two transaction models on Dusk were just a privacy toggle. Public or private. One switch. Simple choice. The actual difference runs deeper than that. Moonlight works like Ethereum. Your account has a nonce. Every transaction increments it publicly. Anyone can see your balance, your history, your sequence. The nonce is a counter. It is also a trail. Phoenix works differently. There is no account. No visible balance. No sequential counter. Instead, when you spend a note, you produce a nullifier. The network records that nullifier and knows the note is gone. But it cannot link the nullifier back to the note it came from. The spending is provable. The identity of what was spent is not. That distinction matters more than it sounds. In Moonlight, your transaction history is a readable story. In Phoenix, the network knows chapters are being written without knowing what they say. What I keep thinking about is which institutions actually want which model. A bank processing a settlement might need Moonlight for audit trails. A fund executing a strategy might need Phoenix to avoid front-running. Both can live on the same chain. Neither forces the other to compromise. What I cannot find in the documentation is how regulators treat nullifiers as evidence. A nonce proves sequence. A nullifier proves spending without revealing the note. Are those legally equivalent in a compliance context? What do you think — when a regulator asks for proof of transaction, does a nullifier satisfy the requirement or does it just raise a harder question? #dusk $DUSK @Dusk_Foundation
At first I assumed the two transaction models on Dusk were just a privacy toggle. Public or private. One switch. Simple choice.

The actual difference runs deeper than that.

Moonlight works like Ethereum. Your account has a nonce. Every transaction increments it publicly. Anyone can see your balance, your history, your sequence. The nonce is a counter. It is also a trail.

Phoenix works differently. There is no account. No visible balance. No sequential counter. Instead, when you spend a note, you produce a nullifier. The network records that nullifier and knows the note is gone. But it cannot link the nullifier back to the note it came from. The spending is provable. The identity of what was spent is not.

That distinction matters more than it sounds. In Moonlight, your transaction history is a readable story. In Phoenix, the network knows chapters are being written without knowing what they say.

What I keep thinking about is which institutions actually want which model. A bank processing a settlement might need Moonlight for audit trails. A fund executing a strategy might need Phoenix to avoid front-running. Both can live on the same chain. Neither forces the other to compromise.

What I cannot find in the documentation is how regulators treat nullifiers as evidence. A nonce proves sequence. A nullifier proves spending without revealing the note. Are those legally equivalent in a compliance context?

What do you think — when a regulator asks for proof of transaction, does a nullifier satisfy the requirement or does it just raise a harder question?

#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
Privacy bolted onto EVM is not the same as privacy built in from day one.#dusk
Privacy bolted onto EVM is not the same as privacy built in from day one.#dusk
AbdullRauf
·
--
At first I assumed adding privacy to an EVM environment was the same as building privacy from the start. From the outside the two look similar. On the inside they are not.

The EVM account model carries a structural assumption. Addresses persist. Activity accumulates. Even when individual transactions are encrypted, the account itself becomes a pattern over time. Hedger adds confidentiality on top of that model. Transaction data can become opaque. The account structure remains visible.

So the real question is narrower. When Hedger encrypts a transaction, what exactly is hidden and what is not? Amounts and internal logic may stay private. The fact that this account interacted with this contract at this time is often still visible. In regulated finance, who traded with whom and when can matter as much as what they traded.

This is not a flaw in the design. Account-based EVM is practical for developers. Hedger is a real privacy layer. The risk is misunderstanding. A privacy layer that people overestimate can be more dangerous than no privacy layer at all.

Does transaction-level confidentiality give institutions enough protection, or does the account model underneath quietly limit the whole promise?

#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
Verified
I used to look at a new consensus design and ask one question first. How does an attacker break this? Studying Dusk changed that habit. With Succinct Attestation, a different scenario appears. Imagine you are already selected to generate a block in a later iteration. You are also voting on the current one. Do you help the current block succeed and take the voter reward, or stay quiet so the iteration fails and your future generator position improves? That is the Future Generator Incentive Problem. It does not come from outside. It comes from the incentives available to a legitimate participant. Dusk’s response was to reshape those incentives. Separate generator and voter rewards. Exclude the next-iteration generator from current voting. Limit how many iterations can run. There is a trade-off. Every extra incentive rule adds another assumption that still needs to hold under pressure. The real game underneath the cryptography is whether the most rational move stays the honest one. #dusk $DUSK @Dusk_Foundation
I used to look at a new consensus design and ask one question first. How does an attacker break this?

Studying Dusk changed that habit. With Succinct Attestation, a different scenario appears. Imagine you are already selected to generate a block in a later iteration. You are also voting on the current one. Do you help the current block succeed and take the voter reward, or stay quiet so the iteration fails and your future generator position improves?

That is the Future Generator Incentive Problem. It does not come from outside. It comes from the incentives available to a legitimate participant.

Dusk’s response was to reshape those incentives. Separate generator and voter rewards. Exclude the next-iteration generator from current voting. Limit how many iterations can run.

There is a trade-off. Every extra incentive rule adds another assumption that still needs to hold under pressure.

The real game underneath the cryptography is whether the most rational move stays the honest one.

#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
$DUSK Is Down 93%… Yet Holding Partnerships and a €200M+ Issuance Pipeline Most Protocols at This Price Don’t Have
$DUSK Is Down 93%… Yet Holding Partnerships and a €200M+ Issuance Pipeline Most Protocols at This Price Don’t Have
AbdullRauf
·
--
Spent time trying to read two signals that point in different directions. The price is down ninety-three percent from its all-time high. The NPEX partnership is live. A confirmed issuance pipeline of over two hundred million euros exists. The Boreas upgrade shipped in May. Those two pictures do not belong to the same narrative. One suggests a project that failed to hold its launch momentum. The other suggests a project that kept building while the price declined. Infrastructure tokens have a timing problem that equity markets do not. A company's stock price and its revenue usually move in the same direction over time. A protocol's token price and its actual usage can diverge for years. The price reflects what traders think today. The usage reflects what institutions decided months ago. What I cannot reconcile is the gap between the confirmed issuance number and the daily trading volume. Two hundred million euros in pipeline against three and a half million in daily volume is a wide distance. Either the issuance has not reached the chain yet or volume is not the right measure. @Dusk has partnerships that most protocols at this price would not. Whether that eventually shows up in the price or just in the history books is the question price charts were never designed to answer. When price and adoption diverge this far, which one is lying?

#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
Log in to explore more content
Join global crypto users on Binance Square
⚡️ Get latest and useful information about crypto.
💬 Trusted by the world’s largest crypto exchange.
👍 Discover real insights from verified creators.
Email / Phone number
Sitemap
Cookie Preferences
Platform T&Cs