🔐 The first “anti-quantum transaction” on BTC has been run successfully, but this price is definitely not something ordinary people can afford!
Quantum computing has long been seen as one of the big bosses BTC might have to face in the future. Now, someone has finally tested it early: on August 26, a researcher successfully completed a quantum-secure transaction on the BTC mainnet, without modifying BTC’s existing consensus rules.
It sounds pretty impressive, but reality is just as straightforward: the cost per transaction is roughly 150–200 USD. Generating the proof relies on multiple high-end GPUs running for several hours, and the transaction size is also far larger than a regular transfer.
In plain terms, this scheme is still like a freshly built armored vehicle—**it can drive and it can fight, but for now it’s not meant for grabbing coffee.**😅
However, I think the key point isn’t whether it’s usable right now, but what it proves: if quantum computing ever truly pushes up against BTC’s security boundary one day, BTC is not completely without backup options.
This test is more like a rehearsal in advance than a weapon meant to be used immediately. What’s really worth paying attention to isn’t whether “quantum computing will destroy BTC tomorrow,” but whether the BTC community can prepare fallback plans before the real threat arrives.👀
Real security has never been about figuring things out only after danger shows up—it’s about having the route back laid out in advance, before the danger even reaches you.$BTC $ENA $AKE #Okta与CrowdStrike财报超预期大涨
Quantum computing has long been seen as one of the big bosses BTC might have to face in the future. Now, someone has finally tested it early: on August 26, a researcher successfully completed a quantum-secure transaction on the BTC mainnet, without modifying BTC’s existing consensus rules.
It sounds pretty impressive, but reality is just as straightforward: the cost per transaction is roughly 150–200 USD. Generating the proof relies on multiple high-end GPUs running for several hours, and the transaction size is also far larger than a regular transfer.
In plain terms, this scheme is still like a freshly built armored vehicle—**it can drive and it can fight, but for now it’s not meant for grabbing coffee.**😅
However, I think the key point isn’t whether it’s usable right now, but what it proves: if quantum computing ever truly pushes up against BTC’s security boundary one day, BTC is not completely without backup options.
This test is more like a rehearsal in advance than a weapon meant to be used immediately. What’s really worth paying attention to isn’t whether “quantum computing will destroy BTC tomorrow,” but whether the BTC community can prepare fallback plans before the real threat arrives.👀
Real security has never been about figuring things out only after danger shows up—it’s about having the route back laid out in advance, before the danger even reaches you.$BTC $ENA $AKE #Okta与CrowdStrike财报超预期大涨
