$GOAT was brushed past today in the square: price $0.016, relatively stable. Stable—almost like it has already exited the narrative spotlight.
Looking through media coverage, GOAT has been placed in the historical chapter of AI memes—first hype $GOAT , then hype the ElizaOS framework. Now, the same set of phrasing is being used to explain tokenized U.S. stocks: hype the first “incarnation,” then shift to the second. GOAT has become the coordinate for the “former wave.”
My core judgment: GOAT is being brought up again this time not because of new volume, but as a reference point for narrative evolution. The market uses GOAT to mark the “last cycle”—capital has already flowed into tokenized U.S. stocks and RWAfi. Price stability may mean old holders are reluctant to leave, but new money has no reason to enter.
Flip the perspective: if the AI meme narrative gets revived again due to new models or apps, GOAT as a cultural symbol could be reactivated. After all, its meme foundation is still there.
A controversy: when the media puts GOAT into the “previous chapter,” would you still be willing to hold a position for its “next chapter”?
Looking through media coverage, GOAT has been placed in the historical chapter of AI memes—first hype $GOAT , then hype the ElizaOS framework. Now, the same set of phrasing is being used to explain tokenized U.S. stocks: hype the first “incarnation,” then shift to the second. GOAT has become the coordinate for the “former wave.”
My core judgment: GOAT is being brought up again this time not because of new volume, but as a reference point for narrative evolution. The market uses GOAT to mark the “last cycle”—capital has already flowed into tokenized U.S. stocks and RWAfi. Price stability may mean old holders are reluctant to leave, but new money has no reason to enter.
Flip the perspective: if the AI meme narrative gets revived again due to new models or apps, GOAT as a cultural symbol could be reactivated. After all, its meme foundation is still there.
A controversy: when the media puts GOAT into the “previous chapter,” would you still be willing to hold a position for its “next chapter”?