【Overview】2 winning trades | 1 losing trade | 0 on hold
【EDEN】⚠️ Limit-exceedance partial sell-off
Direction: Long | Open: 0.06463U | Close: 0.06621U | P&L: +2.44%
Review: The entry met the opening criteria. After price moved upward, it did not reach the target. The limit-exceedance partial sell-off rule was triggered to exit, locking in part of the profits.
【BICO】⚠️ Limit-exceedance partial sell-off
Direction: Long | Open: 0.02389U | Close: 0.02515U | P&L: +5.27%
Review: The signal was clear. After entry, the trade moved in a healthy direction. Due to holding time or volatility triggering the reduction mechanism, discipline was followed properly.
【ONT】❌ Stop-loss hit
Direction: Long | Open: 0.06796U | Close: 0.06146U | P&L: -9.56%
Review: After entry, price moved against the position and directly hit the predefined stop-loss level. There was no buffer, and the single loss was relatively large.
v8 Strategy Reflection
✅ What was right: Signal identification was accurate. Both EDEN and BICO met the opening conditions, and the entry levels were valid.
❌ What was wrong: ONT’s stop-loss setting was too wide, causing the magnitude of the single loss (-9.56%) to far exceed the winning trades (+5.27%, +2.44%). The risk-reward ratio became unbalanced.
💡 What to gain: The limit-exceedance partial sell-off mechanism effectively protected the winning trades, but the stop-loss parameters need to be re-evaluated to ensure single-trade losses are controllable.
One-sentence summary: Winning-trade discipline was executed well, but overly wide stop-losses dragged down overall net value.
【EDEN】⚠️ Limit-exceedance partial sell-off
Direction: Long | Open: 0.06463U | Close: 0.06621U | P&L: +2.44%
Review: The entry met the opening criteria. After price moved upward, it did not reach the target. The limit-exceedance partial sell-off rule was triggered to exit, locking in part of the profits.
【BICO】⚠️ Limit-exceedance partial sell-off
Direction: Long | Open: 0.02389U | Close: 0.02515U | P&L: +5.27%
Review: The signal was clear. After entry, the trade moved in a healthy direction. Due to holding time or volatility triggering the reduction mechanism, discipline was followed properly.
【ONT】❌ Stop-loss hit
Direction: Long | Open: 0.06796U | Close: 0.06146U | P&L: -9.56%
Review: After entry, price moved against the position and directly hit the predefined stop-loss level. There was no buffer, and the single loss was relatively large.
v8 Strategy Reflection
✅ What was right: Signal identification was accurate. Both EDEN and BICO met the opening conditions, and the entry levels were valid.
❌ What was wrong: ONT’s stop-loss setting was too wide, causing the magnitude of the single loss (-9.56%) to far exceed the winning trades (+5.27%, +2.44%). The risk-reward ratio became unbalanced.
💡 What to gain: The limit-exceedance partial sell-off mechanism effectively protected the winning trades, but the stop-loss parameters need to be re-evaluated to ensure single-trade losses are controllable.
One-sentence summary: Winning-trade discipline was executed well, but overly wide stop-losses dragged down overall net value.