BTC began the week attempting to stabilize, with dip buying pushing price toward $88K–$89K as a softer US dollar and a short-term leverage reset briefly improved market structure. However, repeated failures above $90K highlighted weak follow-through demand. As risk sentiment deteriorated and US shutdown concerns resurfaced, BTC was trading around $85K. The decisive move below $80K had its own catalysts: escalating US-Iran geopolitical tensions triggered risk-off flows, a sharp US dollar rally pressured all dollar-denominated assets, and already-thin liquidity magnified downside moves. Price sold off aggressively into the $75K–$77K zone, erasing roughly $800 billion in market value from the October peak and forcing over $2.5 billion in long liquidations. Near-term focus is on holding $75K, with $80K remaining the key to rebuilding confidence.
ETH also bore the brunt of the selloff, reversing sharply this week after repeated failures near the $3,000 level and falling 25.2% over the past seven days. A breakdown of key supports triggered accelerated selling in a thin-liquidity, risk-off environment. The decline extended toward the $2,100–$2,200 zone, with limited rebound strength suggesting that near-term market structure remains fragile. On the positive side of the market crash, HYPE and CC (Canton) held up well, delivering weekly returns of 36.3% and 23.6%, respectively. US President Donald Trump announced that he has nominated Kevin Warsh as the next Chair of the Federal Reserve, intensifying his ongoing criticism of current Chair Jerome Powell and the Fed’s interest-rate policies. Kevin is known for opposing loose monetary policy. He has been skeptical of crypto as money, previously citing Bitcoin’s volatility, though he later acknowledged its role as a portfolio asset and said it does not threaten the dollar.
In other market news, Worldcoin (WLD) surged about 25% within minutes after Forbes reported that OpenAI is exploring biometric verification solutions, potentially using Worldcoin’s technology. OpenAI is reportedly developing a social network that would require “proof of personhood,” using Apple’s Face ID or World Orb Iris scans.
Speaking about prediction markets, Coinbase has launched prediction markets across all 50 US states in partnership with Kalshi, allowing users to trade on outcomes of real-world events spanning sports, politics, and culture. Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong described prediction markets as powerful tools for truth-seeking, arguing that incentives produce more reliable information than opinion-driven narratives. Lastly, Nubank, Latin America’s largest digital bank with about 127 million active customers across Brazil, Mexico, and Colombia, has received conditional approval from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency to establish a US national bank, a step that could enable it to offer crypto custody and broader banking services in the United States. Once fully approved under a federal banking framework, the bank could roll out deposit accounts, credit cards, lending, and digital asset custody.
In this issue, I’ll break down what actually drove the movement, how macro catalysts are compressing into a high-impact window, what on-chain flows are revealing about holder behaviour, and where structural momentum may emerge next.
Let’s get into it.
1. Weekly Crypto Sector Performance

2. Macro Backdrop
1. Crowded Dollar Shorts Unwind as Policy Credibility Reasserts Itself
Markets entered the week positioned for a continuation of dollar weakness, with asset managers holding an estimated $8.3bn in bearish USD exposure. That trade unraveled violently following President Trump’s nomination of Kevin Warsh as Fed Chair. Rather than reinforcing expectations of aggressive political pressure on monetary policy, the nomination was interpreted as a signal that Fed independence may be preserved, at least in form if not in rhetoric.
The result was the sharpest single-day dollar rally since May, catching positioning badly offside. This was less about a fundamental re-rating of U.S. growth and more about the market being forced to reassess an overcrowded narrative trade that had leaned heavily on policy chaos and imminent rate cuts. The speed of the reversal underscores how fragile conviction had become and how quickly sentiment can flip when credibility assumptions are challenged.
2. Precious Metals Capitulation Exposes Leverage Beneath the “Hard Asset” Trade

The dollar squeeze triggered an even more dramatic unwind in precious metals. Silver collapsed 31% in a single session, its worst day since 1980, while gold fell 11% from record highs above $5,600/oz, extending losses into the following week. This was not a slow repricing of fundamentals but a forced deleveraging of a crowded momentum trade that had embedded assumptions of sustained dollar weakness and accelerating monetary debasement.
The violence of the move highlights a key feature of the current regime: assets framed as “hedges” are increasingly behaving like high-beta expressions of liquidity expectations. Once those expectations wobble, the exit is disorderly. For crypto, this is an important parallel. Bitcoin’s hedge narrative remains structurally intact over the long term, but tactically it continues to trade in sympathy with leveraged macro positioning rather than as an independent store of value.
3. Asia Feels the Shock as Growth Narratives Crack
The risk-off impulse rippled quickly into Asia. Korean equities suffered their worst session since November, with the Kospi falling over 5% and triggering a circuit breaker in futures markets. The sell-off was concentrated in semiconductor heavyweights like Samsung and SK Hynix, which had been central to Korea’s AI-driven rally.This matters beyond regional equities. The abrupt reversal reflects growing skepticism around AI capex sustainability and global growth assumptions, themes that have supported risk assets well beyond Asia. When flagship growth narratives show signs of fatigue, liquidity does not rotate smoothly; it retreats. Historically, such episodes coincide with tightening financial conditions for speculative assets, crypto included, as investors de-risk exposure to trades perceived as crowded or duration-sensitive.
4. Bretton Woods III: From Inside Money to Outside Money
Beneath the recent market volatility, a bigger shift is slowly taking place in how the global system stores and values money. For decades, the world relied mainly on financial assets like government bonds and bank credit, especially U.S. dollars, as the foundation of the system. That model is starting to strain as geopolitics, supply-chain risks, and sanctions remind countries that financial assets can be frozen, devalued, or politicized.As a result, some countries are increasingly turning toward tangible assets such as commodities, gold, and energy reserves that cannot be created digitally or easily confiscated. This is what Zoltan Pozsar refers to as a move from “inside money” (financial promises and debt) to “outside money” (real, physical assets). In this framework, Bitcoin sits in between. It is not a physical commodity, but it shares key traits with them: it is scarce, global, and independent of any single government. That is why, over time, Bitcoin could benefit if trust in purely financial systems continues to erode, even if short-term price moves remain volatile.China’s aggressive accumulation of oil, metals, and agricultural reserves, alongside initiatives like the U.S.’s newly announced $12bn “Project Vault” for critical minerals, points to a world where physical assets increasingly anchor economic power. Since early 2025, the CNY has appreciated over 5% against the dollar, while the DXY has fallen more than 10%, lending tentative support to Pozsar’s long-standing thesis.
For crypto, the implication is nuanced. Bitcoin sits uncomfortably between these regimes. It is not “inside money,” but neither is it a physical commodity. In periods of transition, this ambiguity leads to volatility. Over time, however, any sustained erosion of trust in purely financial backstops strengthens the strategic case for non-sovereign monetary assets.
5. Inflation Frictions Re-Emerge, Complicating the Rate-Cut Narrative
Recent U.S. data has injected friction into the otherwise dominant rate-cut narrative. Producer Price Index inflation surprised sharply to the upside, with core PPI rising 0.7% month-on-month, one of the strongest readings since early 2022. ISM manufacturing prices paid also moved higher, while new orders surged to a four-year high, raising questions about whether reflationary pressures are re-accelerating.
Markets have responded by dialing back expectations for near-term easing. The probability of at least one Fed cut by June has fallen meaningfully, and expectations for multiple cuts have largely evaporated. This repricing occurred even after Warsh’s nomination, reinforcing the view that data, not politics, is currently driving rate expectations.
6. Bitcoin Mining Stocks Decouple on Weather Shocks
Bitcoin finished the week lower, but U.S.-listed mining equities briefly decoupled, rallying sharply as Winter Storm Fern knocked a large share of U.S. mining capacity offline. Hashrate fell roughly 40% to ~663 EH/s, easing competitive pressure and improving block economics for resilient operators. Well-capitalized miners benefited both from higher reward share and from curtailing operations to sell power back to stressed grids, temporarily lifting margins. This episode highlighted how miner equities can outperform spot BTC during localized supply shocks, even in a broader risk-off tape.Beyond the weather-driven move, the rally reinforced a structural re-ratingunderway in mining stocks. Companies like Iris Energy, Cipher Mining, and Hut 8 are increasingly valued not just as leveraged BTC plays, but as energy and compute infrastructure platforms. Post-halving margin pressure has accelerated pivots toward AI and HPC hosting, with long-term contracts potentially driving the majority of revenue by late 2026. In a macro environment where crypto remains liquidity-sensitive, miners with credible AI optionality are attracting more durable capital than spot exposure alone.
Implications for Risk Assets and Crypto
The macro picture is increasingly bifurcated. Structurally, the case for hard assets and alternative monetary systems continues to strengthen as geopolitical fragmentation and commodity nationalism rise. Cyclically, however, markets are contending with tighter liquidity, crowded positioning, and renewed inflation uncertainty.For crypto, this creates a familiar tension. Long-term narratives remain intact, but short-term price action is dominated by macro positioning, liquidity shocks, and cross-asset de-risking. Until clarity improves on inflation trajectories and policy credibility, rallies are likely to be fragile, driven more by positioning resets than by sustained inflows.
3. ETF / ETP Flow Insights
Bitcoin ETFs reopen February with decisive inflows.
Bitcoin spot ETFs recorded $561.9M in net inflows, one of the strongest single-day prints this year, with no outflows across funds. Flows were broad-based rather than concentrated, led by Fidelity (FBTC: $153.4M) and BlackRock (IBIT: $142.0M), alongside solid participation from Bitwise, Grayscale, ARK/21Shares, VanEck, Invesco, and WisdomTree. Trading value surged to $7.68B, lifting total net assets to $100.4B, signaling renewed institutional engagement after January’s drawdown.Solana ETFs extend a cautious rebound.
Solana spot ETFs added $5.6M, driven mainly by Bitwise’s BSOL, with Fidelity’s FSOL contributing. Volumes remain modest ($51.2M) and net assets ($883M) suggest improving sentiment, but positioning is still incremental rather than aggressive.Ether ETFs slip despite selective buying.
ETH spot ETFs ended slightly negative (-$2.9M). Inflows into Fidelity, VanEck, and Bitwise were offset by a large $82.1M outflow from BlackRock’s ETHA, pulling net assets down to $13.7B. This pattern reinforces ongoing selectivity and weaker marginal demand versus BTC.XRP ETFs marginally lower.
Small inflows into Bitwise were outweighed by exits from 21Shares, resulting in a -$0.4M net outflow. Trading activity remained light and net assets stable near $1.11B.
Bottom line: February opened with a clear vote of confidence in Bitcoin, reflected in broad, no-outflow inflows and elevated turnover. Elsewhere, ETH and XRP continue to face selective pressure, while SOL quietly rebuilds. The divergence underscores rotation and risk discrimination, not a synchronized risk-on move.
4. Options & Derivatives
Post–Jan 30 expiry, volatility has reset but not cleared.
The ~$8.8B January 30 expiry removed near-term risk, but price has not transitioned into a trend. Short-dated implied volatility has compressed sharply (-10 vols BTC, -15 vols ETH), while term structures remain inverted, signaling expectations of future shocks despite near-term calm. The market is consolidating due to positioning relief, not renewed conviction.Skew stays defensive beneath call-heavy OI.
The 25-delta skew remains negative (-8% BTC, -9% ETH), keeping puts priced at a premium even as headline put/call ratios look benign (BTC ~0.44, ETH ~0.5). This divergence indicates participants are maintaining downside insurance, consistent with cautious, risk-managed exposure rather than outright bullishness.BTC shows selective upside capped by gamma.
BTC options OI has rebuilt to ~$26B, with calls at ~56%, driven by longer-dated positioning at $100k (Feb–Mar). However, gamma pinning in the $85k–95k range has suppressed realized volatility. Put clusters at $90k and $70k signal active hedging against downside resolution if consolidation breaks.Volatility compression is fragile.
February implied volatility averages ~45%, while put premium ratios remain elevated. With 24h volumes nearly balanced (calls ~48%, puts ~52%), the risk is for hedge unwinds to trigger volatility expansion, favoring sharp, mechanically driven moves over orderly breakouts.ETH remains structurally weaker.
ETH options continue to price defensively. Despite call-dominant OI, puts trade richer, with max pain at ~$3,000 and elevated downside interest in the $2,800–2,900 range. Prices below $3k reinforce downside sensitivity, with whale accumulation suggesting stabilization, not trend recovery.
Overall takeaway:
Options positioning reflects selective BTC upside interest but persistent caution, while ETH remains outright defensive. Post-expiry volatility compression is positioning-led, not conviction-led. Any macro or policy catalyst risks asymmetric, fast moves, not a durable trend shift.
5. On-Chain Forensics
Bitcoin has slipped below its True Market Mean Price (TMMP) for the first time since October 2023, a level that represents the average cost basis of all historical Bitcoin buyers and often acts as a regime indicator. Trading above TMMP typically reflects a healthy, profit-led market, while sustained moves below it signal rising stress as a growing share of holders slip into losses. With TMMP currently near $80k, the recent weekly close beneath this level marks a clear deterioration in market structure. Historically, similar breaks, most notably in May 2022, preceded prolonged bear phases, suggesting downside pressure is increasing and bears are beginning to assert control.Bitcoin is now in a supply-testing phase, where coins accumulated near recent highs are being stress-tested after a sharp post-uptrend correction. Price has fallen roughly 32% from ~$108k to ~$73k, pushing the share of supply in profit down from 78% to 56%, leaving ~44% of coins in unrealized loss. This shift matters because many holders who bought near the highs have rapidly moved from comfortable gains to sitting near or below cost, making their behavior, not the price level, the key variable. On-chain, NUPL has dropped to ~0.29, indicating the market is still net profitable but with a much thinner psychological buffer than in strong bull phases. For now, this points to a corrective, conviction-testing phase rather than a structural breakdown, with the next leg determined by whether high-cost holders absorb pressure or distribute into rebounds.
6. The Week Ahead

7. Conclusion
Bitcoin sentiment has deteriorated further, deepening the risk-off backdrop rather than stabilizing. The Crypto Fear & Greed Index has slipped deeper into extreme fear, now reading 17, as Bitcoin revisited the April lows. This marks a clear breakdown in confidence and reinforces the view that recent upside attempts failed to transition into a sustainable recovery phase.

In a market driven by liquidity swings and institutional flow, our Crush Circle platform by CryptoCrush gives investors direct access to expert research, real-time guidance, and the frameworks needed to stay ahead of the next big move.
Source: Cryptocrush