🔥 BINANCE CREATORPAD KI REALITY PAR MERI AWAZ — AND THEN WHAT I SAW
I didn’t just join the campaign and make posts—I also personally observed what kind of content was appearing at the top of the leaderboard. My observation was that high-view, hype-driven posts often showed up in the top positions, while detailed research and balanced analysis weren’t getting as much visibility.
On that reality, I raised my voice and asked: if CreatorPad rewards quality creators, then how much weight does quality, research, and actual analysis carry?
And now, check the screenshot 👇
In the Leaderboard section, I’m not able to see the Top Creator list—only the requirements and points breakdown are visible.
I’m not claiming that the list is hidden because of my criticism—that’s not direct proof I have. But the timing and my earlier observation have certainly raised a serious question.
If the system is transparent, then creators should clearly know what the rankings are based on: views, engagement, trading activity, content quality, or a combination of all of these?
Creators need not only rewards, but also transparency.
If quality genuinely matters, then instead of hiding the leaderboard, its methodology and scoring should be explained openly.
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
I didn’t just join the campaign and make posts—I also personally observed what kind of content was appearing at the top of the leaderboard. My observation was that high-view, hype-driven posts often showed up in the top positions, while detailed research and balanced analysis weren’t getting as much visibility.
On that reality, I raised my voice and asked: if CreatorPad rewards quality creators, then how much weight does quality, research, and actual analysis carry?
And now, check the screenshot 👇
In the Leaderboard section, I’m not able to see the Top Creator list—only the requirements and points breakdown are visible.
I’m not claiming that the list is hidden because of my criticism—that’s not direct proof I have. But the timing and my earlier observation have certainly raised a serious question.
If the system is transparent, then creators should clearly know what the rankings are based on: views, engagement, trading activity, content quality, or a combination of all of these?
Creators need not only rewards, but also transparency.
If quality genuinely matters, then instead of hiding the leaderboard, its methodology and scoring should be explained openly.
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
