#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
A key point is that cryptographic validity doesn’t automatically mean a transaction should go through.
A Dusk transaction can be mathematically valid, yet an application may reject it because it violates a compliance rule spending limit, or eligibility condition.
That creates an important separation between is this transaction valid? and should this transaction be allowed?
I think that distinction matters a lot for regulated assets.
How should Dusk applications balance cryptographic freedom with real world compliance?
$DUSK
A key point is that cryptographic validity doesn’t automatically mean a transaction should go through.
A Dusk transaction can be mathematically valid, yet an application may reject it because it violates a compliance rule spending limit, or eligibility condition.
That creates an important separation between is this transaction valid? and should this transaction be allowed?
I think that distinction matters a lot for regulated assets.
How should Dusk applications balance cryptographic freedom with real world compliance?
$DUSK