#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
Previously, I used to think that the more public a blockchain is, the more trustworthy it becomes. If everyone can see the data and verify transactions together, then there's not much room for ambiguity. But when I started learning about Dusk, I began to realize that assumption isn't entirely a good fit for the financial market.
What caught my attention is that Dusk doesn't try to
turn privacy into an absolute veil. They talk more about selective disclosure: data can remain undisclosed to the general public, yet still be revealed to parties that are authorized to verify it. Along with zero-knowledge proofs and confidential transfers, this approach made me realize that the real problem isn't simply "public versus private," but rather who can see what, and under what circumstances.
I find this especially reasonable when applied to managed assets. A securities transaction probably shouldn't expose all information to the market upfront, but regulators still need the ability to verify things when there's a legitimate reason. If a blockchain can't satisfy both needs at the same time, putting finance on-chain likely remains just an idea.
Previously, I used to think that the more public a blockchain is, the more trustworthy it becomes. If everyone can see the data and verify transactions together, then there's not much room for ambiguity. But when I started learning about Dusk, I began to realize that assumption isn't entirely a good fit for the financial market.
What caught my attention is that Dusk doesn't try to
turn privacy into an absolute veil. They talk more about selective disclosure: data can remain undisclosed to the general public, yet still be revealed to parties that are authorized to verify it. Along with zero-knowledge proofs and confidential transfers, this approach made me realize that the real problem isn't simply "public versus private," but rather who can see what, and under what circumstances.
I find this especially reasonable when applied to managed assets. A securities transaction probably shouldn't expose all information to the market upfront, but regulators still need the ability to verify things when there's a legitimate reason. If a blockchain can't satisfy both needs at the same time, putting finance on-chain likely remains just an idea.