#dusk $DUSK @Dusk I checked CertiK’s Skynet page for DUSK on August 22 expecting its audit history to show up somewhere in the score.
Instead I found a strange mismatch.
DUSK currently shows
Skynet Score: 62.49
Grade: B
Code Security: 50%
3rd Party Audit: No
Audits: Not Available
But Dusk’s official public audit repository currently lists 12 reports.
That includes reviews from OAK Security, JP Aumasson POL Finance Jules de Smit Zellic Porter Adams Blaize Security and Mochavi.
The surprising part is CertiK’s own methodology.
It says Audit History systematically aggregates publicly available reports from established security providers.
So this isn’t simply a case of outside audits being irrelevant to the methodology.
That makes the current “3rd Party Audit No” display difficult to reconcile with Dusk’s public repository.
To be fair, an audit count alone does not prove a protocol is secure, and CertiK’s overall score measures far more than audits.
But “3rd Party Audit No” communicates something much narrower and Dusk’s public audit record does not appear to match it.
The security work is visible.
The scorecard currently isn’t displaying it.
If audit history carries high weight in Code Security, how would DUSK’s score change if those 12 reports were reflected in Skynet’s Audit History?
@Dusk #dusk $DUSK
Instead I found a strange mismatch.
DUSK currently shows
Skynet Score: 62.49
Grade: B
Code Security: 50%
3rd Party Audit: No
Audits: Not Available
But Dusk’s official public audit repository currently lists 12 reports.
That includes reviews from OAK Security, JP Aumasson POL Finance Jules de Smit Zellic Porter Adams Blaize Security and Mochavi.
The surprising part is CertiK’s own methodology.
It says Audit History systematically aggregates publicly available reports from established security providers.
So this isn’t simply a case of outside audits being irrelevant to the methodology.
That makes the current “3rd Party Audit No” display difficult to reconcile with Dusk’s public repository.
To be fair, an audit count alone does not prove a protocol is secure, and CertiK’s overall score measures far more than audits.
But “3rd Party Audit No” communicates something much narrower and Dusk’s public audit record does not appear to match it.
The security work is visible.
The scorecard currently isn’t displaying it.
If audit history carries high weight in Code Security, how would DUSK’s score change if those 12 reports were reflected in Skynet’s Audit History?
@Dusk #dusk $DUSK
