#termmax There’s a detail I observed for three days before I realized it: the interest-rate number on the TermMax page and the kind of interest-rate number you see on Aave are fundamentally not the same thing.
Aave’s rate is calculated by a formula: it uses utilization to generate a number, and all depositors passively accept it. TermMax’s rate is traded—the depth of the FT discount is determined by real limit orders in the order book. The curator sets a target interest-rate range to provide liquidity, and the matched trades between borrowers and lenders push the price back and forth. What you ultimately see as the implied annualized figure is, in essence, a market price produced by trading, not a parameter supplied by an algorithm. $SPCXB
This difference may sound like nitpicking, but if you follow it through, the conclusion is very practical. Algorithmic rates don’t have an “opinion”; they only reflect current supply and demand for capital. In traded rates, participants’ judgments about the future are embedded. For the same asset, if the implied rates for 30-day vs. 90-day terms differ noticeably, the spread is basically the market telling you how it views the funding conditions over those two months—the yield curve’s term structure is steep, it suggests someone is willing to pay a premium to lock in the long end; if the structure flattens or even inverts, the signal is completely different. $SNDKB
My habit now is to check, every day, the implied interest rates across several mainstream markets on TermMax with different maturities—not to trade, but just to see what shape the on-chain yield curve takes. In traditional finance, this is the most basic macro signal. Before DeFi, there wasn’t a decent term market, so the curve literally couldn’t be drawn; now it’s finally being put together.
But we should also be honest about the limitations: the depth of the on-chain term market is still shallow—individual large orders can distort the implied rate, and the signal quality of the curve is far inferior to that of the Treasury market. So it can only serve as a reference, not as a basis for decisions.
Have you ever used the spread between rates of different maturities to make any directional judgment? @TermMax
Aave’s rate is calculated by a formula: it uses utilization to generate a number, and all depositors passively accept it. TermMax’s rate is traded—the depth of the FT discount is determined by real limit orders in the order book. The curator sets a target interest-rate range to provide liquidity, and the matched trades between borrowers and lenders push the price back and forth. What you ultimately see as the implied annualized figure is, in essence, a market price produced by trading, not a parameter supplied by an algorithm. $SPCXB
This difference may sound like nitpicking, but if you follow it through, the conclusion is very practical. Algorithmic rates don’t have an “opinion”; they only reflect current supply and demand for capital. In traded rates, participants’ judgments about the future are embedded. For the same asset, if the implied rates for 30-day vs. 90-day terms differ noticeably, the spread is basically the market telling you how it views the funding conditions over those two months—the yield curve’s term structure is steep, it suggests someone is willing to pay a premium to lock in the long end; if the structure flattens or even inverts, the signal is completely different. $SNDKB
My habit now is to check, every day, the implied interest rates across several mainstream markets on TermMax with different maturities—not to trade, but just to see what shape the on-chain yield curve takes. In traditional finance, this is the most basic macro signal. Before DeFi, there wasn’t a decent term market, so the curve literally couldn’t be drawn; now it’s finally being put together.
But we should also be honest about the limitations: the depth of the on-chain term market is still shallow—individual large orders can distort the implied rate, and the signal quality of the curve is far inferior to that of the Treasury market. So it can only serve as a reference, not as a basis for decisions.
Have you ever used the spread between rates of different maturities to make any directional judgment? @TermMax
每天看链上利率曲线d
0%
看APY数字高低
100%
第一次听说期限结构
0%
1 votes • Voting closed