#termmax @TermMax TermMax airdrop will be decided this afternoon—though I’d advise you not to obsess over those points and grind yourself to death.
Once the afternoon results are up, whether it’s witch or not, whatever amount of money is sitting in your wallet will be exposed by the mirror—no hiding.
I ran the numbers: a market cap of 180 million, total supply of 1 billion. 1% is 1.8 million U. But don’t forget that the booster wave already went out early at 0.2%, leaving the Alpha pool. Even optimistically, that’s about 0.8%. Spread across 50,000 allocations, that’s roughly 30-odd U per person. Honestly, it’s not proportional to the effort you’re putting into farming points.
The threshold? 220 at most. Maybe 200 is enough to pass. So there’s really no need to stay up late spamming interactions—it's not worth it.
But if you say TermMax is just a small player, that would be wrong. Back when the RWA wave hit early this year, it got into U.S. stock token-backed lending, and the traffic it pulls is mouthful after mouthful. In March it teamed up with Morpho—its TVL shot up to 49 million. In the lending track, it ranks second. By end of May, V2 launched; and in July, Phase 4’s 20 million RLUSD deposits were snapped up in a day—that kind of heat isn’t pretending. Now it has 1.5 million registered wallets, 90,000 daily active users, and TVL is up to 90 million.
So does it have much influence? It does. Will it only give 0.5%? Not impossible—that would surely push the threshold higher.
But here’s the thing: in the lending space, it comes down to TVL. It just received funding from YZi Labs, so it has to give a big platform a reason to pull in deposits. I bet the project team isn’t clueless. They’ll give the full 1%, and then add a tidy, safe staking booster—heat and deposits both win. That logic is so clear I can probably hear the clack of the abacus all the way in Henan. We’ll know this afternoon.
Once the afternoon results are up, whether it’s witch or not, whatever amount of money is sitting in your wallet will be exposed by the mirror—no hiding.
I ran the numbers: a market cap of 180 million, total supply of 1 billion. 1% is 1.8 million U. But don’t forget that the booster wave already went out early at 0.2%, leaving the Alpha pool. Even optimistically, that’s about 0.8%. Spread across 50,000 allocations, that’s roughly 30-odd U per person. Honestly, it’s not proportional to the effort you’re putting into farming points.
The threshold? 220 at most. Maybe 200 is enough to pass. So there’s really no need to stay up late spamming interactions—it's not worth it.
But if you say TermMax is just a small player, that would be wrong. Back when the RWA wave hit early this year, it got into U.S. stock token-backed lending, and the traffic it pulls is mouthful after mouthful. In March it teamed up with Morpho—its TVL shot up to 49 million. In the lending track, it ranks second. By end of May, V2 launched; and in July, Phase 4’s 20 million RLUSD deposits were snapped up in a day—that kind of heat isn’t pretending. Now it has 1.5 million registered wallets, 90,000 daily active users, and TVL is up to 90 million.
So does it have much influence? It does. Will it only give 0.5%? Not impossible—that would surely push the threshold higher.
But here’s the thing: in the lending space, it comes down to TVL. It just received funding from YZi Labs, so it has to give a big platform a reason to pull in deposits. I bet the project team isn’t clueless. They’ll give the full 1%, and then add a tidy, safe staking booster—heat and deposits both win. That logic is so clear I can probably hear the clack of the abacus all the way in Henan. We’ll know this afternoon.