#termmax I used to look at DeFi lending and borrowing, and nearly all of my attention went to the collateralization ratio. How much can you borrow with ETH? Where are the liquidation levels for BTC? Is the utilization rate of the stablecoin pool high? These metrics are, of course, important—but the longer I use this space, the more I feel there’s another issue that’s easier to overlook: just because an asset is sitting in your wallet doesn’t mean it truly has capital efficiency.
For example, if I hold an asset I believe will perform well long term, I don’t want to sell it—selling might cause me to miss subsequent upside. But I also don’t want it to just lie there doing nothing. Traditional approaches are usually to deposit it as collateral, borrow stablecoins, and then seek yield opportunities. However, once interest rates keep fluctuating, the whole decision becomes hard to calculate.
You think you’ve gained liquidity, but in reality, beyond price risk, you’ve added an additional layer of interest-rate risk.
When I recently revisited #TermMax @TermMax , what struck me most was its handling of “maturity/term.” It doesn’t put all liquidity into a pool that changes at any moment. Instead, it lets borrowers and lenders make different choices around the maturity date, fixed income, and collateral.
For lenders, FTs feel more like an asset with return specified in advance. If you buy below par value and settle at par value at maturity, the logic of the returns is easier to judge than a deposit APY that keeps changing. For borrowers, after posting collateral to obtain financing, they don’t need to stare at the interest-rate curve every day to guess what comes next.
This isn’t to say that fixed rates are always better than floating rates. When market conditions change quickly, floating pools still have their value—especially for short-term funds and immediate liquidity needs.
But what TermMax offers is another option: once you already know how long you’ll need the funds, you don’t have to hand the full cost over to market sentiment.
I think this is the more mature direction for DeFi lending and borrowing—not only “how much you can earn by depositing” and “what you can do by borrowing,” but starting to help users manage their own time costs.
Asset prices fluctuating is completely normal, but the financing term should at least be a variable you can choose proactively. @TermMax $BTC
For example, if I hold an asset I believe will perform well long term, I don’t want to sell it—selling might cause me to miss subsequent upside. But I also don’t want it to just lie there doing nothing. Traditional approaches are usually to deposit it as collateral, borrow stablecoins, and then seek yield opportunities. However, once interest rates keep fluctuating, the whole decision becomes hard to calculate.
You think you’ve gained liquidity, but in reality, beyond price risk, you’ve added an additional layer of interest-rate risk.
When I recently revisited #TermMax @TermMax , what struck me most was its handling of “maturity/term.” It doesn’t put all liquidity into a pool that changes at any moment. Instead, it lets borrowers and lenders make different choices around the maturity date, fixed income, and collateral.
For lenders, FTs feel more like an asset with return specified in advance. If you buy below par value and settle at par value at maturity, the logic of the returns is easier to judge than a deposit APY that keeps changing. For borrowers, after posting collateral to obtain financing, they don’t need to stare at the interest-rate curve every day to guess what comes next.
This isn’t to say that fixed rates are always better than floating rates. When market conditions change quickly, floating pools still have their value—especially for short-term funds and immediate liquidity needs.
But what TermMax offers is another option: once you already know how long you’ll need the funds, you don’t have to hand the full cost over to market sentiment.
I think this is the more mature direction for DeFi lending and borrowing—not only “how much you can earn by depositing” and “what you can do by borrowing,” but starting to help users manage their own time costs.
Asset prices fluctuating is completely normal, but the financing term should at least be a variable you can choose proactively. @TermMax $BTC
A. 资产效率最重要
38%
B. 更在意融资成本
0%
C. 短期资金用浮动
12%
D. 长期仓位选固定
50%
8 votes • Voting closed