I was reading the TermMax docs the night before last Tuesday evening, originally to look up the returns—then I clicked into Alpha Market and froze when I saw the words “No Liquidation”

I’ve played with DeFi leverage for years; liquidation levels are like gravity—once you drop below them, you have to accept it. Then someone says leverage can come without a liquidation level, and my first thought was: isn’t this a capital pool?
#termmax @TermMax

After reading it again and again, I finally understood: Alpha Market packages leverage as options. You pay a premium (Max Cost) to buy a call option—if the price goes up you profit, if it drops you lose at most the premium. There’s no liquidation, and no Margin Call. This is completely different from traditional leverage. In the past, leverage meant borrowing money to add positions: you have to repay, and if the collateral falls below the line, you get blown up. Here, you’re buying—buying the right to benefit from price movement. I stared at the Max Cost field for a long time before it clicked in: isn’t this just an option? But it’s not quite the same as Deribit

I did the math using a notional position of 100k U. With a 5% premium, that’s 5,000 U. The opening fee at 7% is 350 U. Interest held for one day at an annualized 100% is about 274 U. Exercise fee is estimated at 100 U. If ETH crashes by 50%, the maximum loss is about 5,724 U—and you won’t be liquidated. Using the same 100k U on Aave, a 30% drop triggers liquidation; a 10% penalty would wipe out 10k U, not to mention slippage. Judging purely by the loss ceiling, Alpha really does feel like it puts insurance on leverage
#termmax @TermMax
But “no liquidation” isn’t free. The premium moves with the AMM rate—when volatility is high it can jump to 8% or even 10%. In a bull market, the cost is very high. Time value burns away every day, unlike borrowing leverage where you can hold through the pressure. Another question: where does the option liquidity come from? Everyone buys calls—who sells? A friend who does market-making said it’s like a Covered Call turned upside down, but the seller’s risk is huge. If the exercise rate is too high, the seller loses money and liquidity will dry up

TermMax has 830k registered wallets, a daily active peak of 170k, and TVL of 64M, but Alpha’s trading volume and exercise rate still don’t have data. Once it runs, focus on two things: whether trading volume can support liquidity, and whether the exercise rate could get so high that sellers decide to run. Still, this idea does crack open the liquidation line by just a little
Alpha “零清算” 是不是真正革新
0%
A 是重大机制创新
0%
B 只是期权换壳包装
0%
C 噱头大于实际价值
100%
1 votes • Voting closed