AbdullRauf
8.2k Posts
AbdullRauf
Square VerifiedHi Guys i am Spot trader specialist in Intra Daytrade, DCA and Swing trade. Follow me tostay updated about market and Binance reward Campaigns.
Open Trade
Frequent Trader
1.3 Years
1.1K+ Following
30.1K+ Followers
27.0K+ Liked
Posts
Portfolio
All
Quotes
Videos
Live
PINNED
Verified
Spent time trying to read two signals that point in different directions. The price is down ninety-three percent from its all-time high. The NPEX partnership is live. A confirmed issuance pipeline of over two hundred million euros exists. The Boreas upgrade shipped in May. Those two pictures do not belong to the same narrative. One suggests a project that failed to hold its launch momentum. The other suggests a project that kept building while the price declined. Infrastructure tokens have a timing problem that equity markets do not. A company's stock price and its revenue usually move in the same direction over time. A protocol's token price and its actual usage can diverge for years. The price reflects what traders think today. The usage reflects what institutions decided months ago. What I cannot reconcile is the gap between the confirmed issuance number and the daily trading volume. Two hundred million euros in pipeline against three and a half million in daily volume is a wide distance. Either the issuance has not reached the chain yet or volume is not the right measure. @Dusk has partnerships that most protocols at this price would not. Whether that eventually shows up in the price or just in the history books is the question price charts were never designed to answer. When price and adoption diverge this far, which one is lying?
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
PINNED
GIVEAWAY ALERT 🧧
We're giving away 2000 gifts to our Square Family as a huge thank you for your support!
To Enter:
✅ Follow
✅ Share this post
✅ Comment "666 !"
Random winners will be selected. Good luck, everyone! 🚀
We're giving away 2000 gifts to our Square Family as a huge thank you for your support!
To Enter:
✅ Follow
✅ Share this post
✅ Comment "666 !"
Random winners will be selected. Good luck, everyone! 🚀
·
--
🎙️ 🚀 $DUSK Live Trading Hub Campaign Special 🔥
⚡ Real-Time Analysis
End
01 h 46 m 16 s
488
4
go
AbdullRauf
·
--
GIVEAWAY ALERT 🧧
We're giving away 2000 gifts to our Square Family as a huge thank you for your support!
To Enter:
✅ Follow
✅ Share this post
✅ Comment "666 !"
Random winners will be selected. Good luck, everyone! 🚀
We're giving away 2000 gifts to our Square Family as a huge thank you for your support!
To Enter:
✅ Follow
✅ Share this post
✅ Comment "666 !"
Random winners will be selected. Good luck, everyone! 🚀
·
--
🎙️ Invest Together in BNB DCA. Let's Talk About the First-Level Market
End
02 h 19 m 54 s
15.6k
11
Verified
At first I assumed regulated finance could not move on-chain because regulators would never allow it. The rules were too strict. The systems were too closed. Blockchain was too open.
Then the numbers appeared. More than €200 million in confirmed issuance through NPEX, a regulated Dutch exchange working with Dusk. That did not look like resistance. It looked like the opposite.
What held me was the quieter realization underneath. Regulators were not the main blocker. Infrastructure was. When the rails could support eligibility, settlement, and controlled disclosure, the regulatory path became usable. The permission was not granted after the fact. It became possible because the design finally matched the requirements.
What I still cannot settle is how far this stays local. NPEX is a Dutch venue. Whether this model expands beyond Europe or remains a regional experiment is still open.
When regulated finance moves on-chain, does blockchain become more regulated, or does finance become more free?
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
Then the numbers appeared. More than €200 million in confirmed issuance through NPEX, a regulated Dutch exchange working with Dusk. That did not look like resistance. It looked like the opposite.
What held me was the quieter realization underneath. Regulators were not the main blocker. Infrastructure was. When the rails could support eligibility, settlement, and controlled disclosure, the regulatory path became usable. The permission was not granted after the fact. It became possible because the design finally matched the requirements.
What I still cannot settle is how far this stays local. NPEX is a Dutch venue. Whether this model expands beyond Europe or remains a regional experiment is still open.
When regulated finance moves on-chain, does blockchain become more regulated, or does finance become more free?
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
·
--
🎙️ Hawk maintains ecological balance and spreads the idea of freedom!
End
03 h 03 m 59 s
5.6k
68
·
--
🎙️ Crypto market updates and discussion; answers to new users’ questions ✅ Build the Binance Plaza 🦅 Spread the ideas of freedom! Maintain ecological balance!
End
03 h 21 m 35 s
10.8k
85
go
Quoted content has been removed
·
--
🎙️ 🔥BNB sprint to 1000, BTC targets 82,000, ETH targets 2,800. The ATM system catches a bullish trend—buy the dip and go long near support, then short at higher levels. Remember: strictly use stop-loss!
End
05 h 47 m 12 s
6.2k
10
At first I assumed confidential meant hidden from everyone. Encrypted data, no visibility, the transaction exists but nobody outside can read it. Hedger works differently. The transaction data is encrypted and externally opaque. Authorized regulators can still audit it. The encryption is not a wall. It is a door with a guest list. What I kept sitting with is the phrase authorized regulators. That phrase does a lot of work quietly. It decides who is on the list. It decides how someone gets added. It presumably decides how someone gets removed. None of that is the cryptography. All of that is governance. The technical privacy is real. The governance privacy is a different question entirely. You are not invisible inside Hedger. You are selectively visible to a set of parties @Dusk and its partners have defined. That might be exactly the right design for regulated finance. It is also not what most people mean when they hear the word confidential. When privacy means hidden from everyone except the people who matter to the system, who decides who matters?
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
Partly True
At first I assumed a fixed one-billion supply was the strongest signal in the $TMX design. Spent time with the actual unlock schedule and realized the more important number is the float.
Only about 200 million is expected to circulate at the start. Investor tokens alone release roughly 11.67 million per month after the cliff. Add team and advisor unlocks and the monthly linear flow can reach around 17.67 million. Scheduled dilution is normal. The real test is whether real demand and protocol revenue absorb the new supply faster than it arrives.
The 150 million team allocation equals 75 percent of the initial circulating supply. Team plus investors together total 430 million more than twice the day-one float. That changes how the phrase “fixed supply” lands. Scarcity on paper is one thing. What becomes sellable and when is another.
I am watching the free float and the speed at which it expands more than the headline billion. Supply discipline is not only what exists eventually. It is what becomes available when.
#termmax @TermMax
Only about 200 million is expected to circulate at the start. Investor tokens alone release roughly 11.67 million per month after the cliff. Add team and advisor unlocks and the monthly linear flow can reach around 17.67 million. Scheduled dilution is normal. The real test is whether real demand and protocol revenue absorb the new supply faster than it arrives.
The 150 million team allocation equals 75 percent of the initial circulating supply. Team plus investors together total 430 million more than twice the day-one float. That changes how the phrase “fixed supply” lands. Scarcity on paper is one thing. What becomes sellable and when is another.
I am watching the free float and the speed at which it expands more than the headline billion. Supply discipline is not only what exists eventually. It is what becomes available when.
#termmax @TermMax
·
--
🎙️ Bull run fast return—has Musk’s little dogecoin got on board?
End
04 h 09 m 31 s
6.7k
273
Log in to explore more content