Wall Street capital will also short and harvest MINA, CELO, and AVAX. The underlying playbook is in the same line as RVN—yet it will tailor entirely different bearish narratives to each coin’s mechanism, rather than copying the PoW coin playbook of “chain reorganization” and “collapse of the underlying consensus.”
For AVAX: very little is made of underlying blockchain security crises. The media focus instead on the underwhelming progress of subnet ecosystem development, intensifying competition in the public chain sector, the slow rollout of institutional RWA, and heavy sell-pressure from large early team unlocks—weakening market confidence in the ecosystem’s outlook.
For CELO: the bearish points center on competition in the mobile public chain track, weak growth in the stablecoin business, and the continuous unlocking and circulation of staked tokens—concentrating on bottlenecks in the growth of the business model.
For MINA: bears keep amplifying the pressure from inflation release, the slow realization of the lightweight ZK narrative, and the lack of ecosystem applications. Market panic revolves around token unlocks and the growth space of the track.
All three are POS-mechanism public chains. The network architecture makes it difficult to spread panic about ledger splits or block rollbacks. Capital understands the differences: suppressing RVN relies on a doomsday thesis about underlying security; shorting POS public chains focuses everything on ecosystem performance, unlock schedules, and competitive conditions in the track.
What remains unchanged is the complete closed-loop method: first, pump the price to lure retail investors to chase higher; then deploy tailored bearish news. Relying on automated trading bots to dump and crush the perpetual long side, they wait until market sentiment hits a low point, then buy again to go long on the other side—achieving a repeating cycle of killing both longs and shorts. Various bearish stories are fabricated as needed. For people driven by fear and greed, their mindset is always the core target of capital harvesting.
For AVAX: very little is made of underlying blockchain security crises. The media focus instead on the underwhelming progress of subnet ecosystem development, intensifying competition in the public chain sector, the slow rollout of institutional RWA, and heavy sell-pressure from large early team unlocks—weakening market confidence in the ecosystem’s outlook.
For CELO: the bearish points center on competition in the mobile public chain track, weak growth in the stablecoin business, and the continuous unlocking and circulation of staked tokens—concentrating on bottlenecks in the growth of the business model.
For MINA: bears keep amplifying the pressure from inflation release, the slow realization of the lightweight ZK narrative, and the lack of ecosystem applications. Market panic revolves around token unlocks and the growth space of the track.
All three are POS-mechanism public chains. The network architecture makes it difficult to spread panic about ledger splits or block rollbacks. Capital understands the differences: suppressing RVN relies on a doomsday thesis about underlying security; shorting POS public chains focuses everything on ecosystem performance, unlock schedules, and competitive conditions in the track.
What remains unchanged is the complete closed-loop method: first, pump the price to lure retail investors to chase higher; then deploy tailored bearish news. Relying on automated trading bots to dump and crush the perpetual long side, they wait until market sentiment hits a low point, then buy again to go long on the other side—achieving a repeating cycle of killing both longs and shorts. Various bearish stories are fabricated as needed. For people driven by fear and greed, their mindset is always the core target of capital harvesting.