@Dusk
i pulled up dusk's github alongside its price chart earlier today just to see if the numbers matched the story, and they don't — not even close. ten independent security audits before mainnet, chainlink ccip live, cordial systems onboarded for institutional custody, dusk pay shipped, the two-way bridge activated. that's not a quiet quarter for any l1.
price is sitting near $0.10, way off its ath, like none of that happened.
i get that commit counts alone don't mean much — you can pad a repo with doc changes and dependency bumps and call it activity. but ten audits and a live custody integration aren't cosmetic, those are things that actually have to work before institutions touch the chain. so either the market's mispricing execution risk that's already been retired, or it's pricing in something else entirely that i'm just not seeing from the dev side.
which one is it, and if it's the second thing — what's actually being priced in that github can't show me? 🧐
#dusk $DUSK
i pulled up dusk's github alongside its price chart earlier today just to see if the numbers matched the story, and they don't — not even close. ten independent security audits before mainnet, chainlink ccip live, cordial systems onboarded for institutional custody, dusk pay shipped, the two-way bridge activated. that's not a quiet quarter for any l1.
price is sitting near $0.10, way off its ath, like none of that happened.
i get that commit counts alone don't mean much — you can pad a repo with doc changes and dependency bumps and call it activity. but ten audits and a live custody integration aren't cosmetic, those are things that actually have to work before institutions touch the chain. so either the market's mispricing execution risk that's already been retired, or it's pricing in something else entirely that i'm just not seeing from the dev side.
which one is it, and if it's the second thing — what's actually being priced in that github can't show me? 🧐
#dusk $DUSK
