One trade of $14.62 turned into one of $23.54. The ruler I placed has been lifted by more than sixty percent in a day. In the same period, $EPIC on Binance spot is down 13.6% over 24h; the current price is $0.406。

As the ruler rises, the market moves downward。

Last night at 22:12, I locked in a criterion: the spot average order amount (i.e., 24h trading volume divided by the number of trades) for $EPIC —only after it returns above $40 will any rebound be the kind of rebound that’s just built from a pile of small change. I set three tiers; tonight at 22:00 the settlement will happen. If it’s below $20, I’m right. If it’s above $40, I’ve been overturned. The middle section is the gray zone—if it lands in the gray zone, I’ll say it plainly: it’s the gray zone。

$23.54. Gray zone。

I could’ve framed this number as good news: the size of one trade has grown by sixty percent. It sounds like big money is coming back to take the bag. But once you split the numerator and denominator, it doesn’t sound so good。

The denominator collapsed by 80% over the day; the number of trades dropped from 1.94 million to 385,000. The numerator fell by less than 30%, and Binance spot trading volume right now is $9.07 million。

The drop below is faster than the drop above, so the average order amount naturally climbs. The group trading in “small change” left first; the remaining people look a bit more decent on average per trade—nothing more than that。

Hourly it’s even clearer. From 19:00 to 21:00, the average climbed steadily from $26.35 to $30.82. During the same period, only about 100k to 200k trades per hour happened, with the trade count fluctuating between 6,000 and 8,000. The numbers look prettier, but the order book is getting thinner。

The place where I need to be held accountable tonight is the ruler itself. This indicator—the average order amount—lies when the overall volume shrinks. It can’t tell whether someone started placing big orders, or whether the people placing small orders just stopped playing. This is a pit I dug myself: when I set the $40 threshold yesterday, I never even considered that the denominator would break first。

At the same second, you can use $HOME as a reference. One trade of $96.36—that’s four times $EPIC ’s. The trade count is only a bit over 200k, yet the order book is more than twice as thick as $EPIC ’s. More money, fewer people, bigger orders—that’s what the average order amount is supposed to look like. Over at $BTC , one trade is $525.62. This $23.54 for $EPIC is something that was squeezed out。

Tomorrow, August 12 at 22:00, I’ll reset the watch at the same time and focus on the denominator again. Only when the trade count is back above 500k and the average order amount holds above $20 can you say that real money has come in to take over. If the trade count keeps falling below 300k, then even if the average climbs to $30, I still won’t admit it—that would mean the market is basically running out of breath。

I wrote down another line: the retail long/short ratio moved from 0.8212 last night to 1.0173 tonight. The longs added people, but the price still fell all day. These two lines are splitting right now—let’s look at them together tomorrow。

The ruler is something I drew myself. The first time I brought it out to use, my own denominator humiliated me. It’s embarrassing—but it’s still better than pretending to understand and then being wrong.