#bstockscis
#bStocksCIS
@BinanceCIS
📊 99% of deals can be fractional — but that doesn’t mean 99% of money is “small”

There’s one detail in bStocks statistics that made me look at trading volume a bit differently.

Tesla is a good example.

In early data, about 99.65% of TSLAB deals by number were fractional.

The first reaction might be:

“Almost everyone buys with very small amounts.”

But it’s not quite like that.

If you look not at the **number of deals**, but at the **trade value**, the picture changes: fractional deals accounted for about 88.5% of the total trading volume for TSLAB.

Why does this matter?

Because one metric shows **frequency**, while the other shows **the money that actually went through the market**.

Let’s imagine:

100 deals for $10 = $1,000

and

1 deal for $1,000 = also $1,000.

By number of deals, the first group looks 100 times more active.

By value, they’re the same.

That’s why I’m more cautious now with phrases like “most traders make small deals.”

First, you need to ask:

**“Most by number or by money volume?”**

📚 Practical takeaway:

When analyzing any market, don’t rely on a single number.

Trade count, trading volume, and average trade size can tell completely different stories.