$BMT soared by 152%, but the funding rate is negative.
This doesn’t contradict anything—this is a typical feature of a short squeeze.
📊 Current data:
Price: 0.0376U | 24H: +151.94%
Funding rate: -0.0140% ← Negative!
Long/short ratio: 0.88 ← There are still more shorts
Short-squeeze logic: shorts build huge positions → the price is pushed up → short liquidation triggers stop-loss explosions → the price keeps rising
But the negative funding rate indicates: shorts are still in the market, and the short squeeze may not be over yet.
The key question: what happens after the squeeze ends?
Once the shorts fully close out and there’s no new buying pressure, what will the price do?
I’ve seen many situations like this—how hard it can surge, it can fall just as fast.
Did you participate in this wave?
#BMT #合约交易 #加密货币 #Market analysis
This doesn’t contradict anything—this is a typical feature of a short squeeze.
📊 Current data:
Price: 0.0376U | 24H: +151.94%
Funding rate: -0.0140% ← Negative!
Long/short ratio: 0.88 ← There are still more shorts
Short-squeeze logic: shorts build huge positions → the price is pushed up → short liquidation triggers stop-loss explosions → the price keeps rising
But the negative funding rate indicates: shorts are still in the market, and the short squeeze may not be over yet.
The key question: what happens after the squeeze ends?
Once the shorts fully close out and there’s no new buying pressure, what will the price do?
I’ve seen many situations like this—how hard it can surge, it can fall just as fast.
Did you participate in this wave?
#BMT #合约交易 #加密货币 #Market analysis