Dear @BinanceCIS and @Binance Square Official !

Previously, I didn't participate in Creator Pad. The promotion #bStocksCIS is the second one for me— the first was #baby

I'll start with why I decided to take part in the very first Babylon campaign. I received an invitation. For those reading, it doesn't mean I'm some kind of special person—most likely there were open spots, and I just ended up there at random. But thank you for that invitation, which prompted me to begin. And to prove to myself that I'm a good author.

Then for invited participants there were separate conditions: more than 500 subscribers and trading volume within “Write and Earn” for the last month greater than zero. The global leaderboard, however, worked under the general conditions.

I learned about bStocksCIS when I was completing tasks on the last day of the Babylon campaign. I saw a new promotion with a topic that was new and interesting to me, and I decided to take part as well. (Thank you—I learned a lot)

Today is the fifth day of #bStocksCIS, and this is what worries me.

I looked at the leaderboard. And even among the top 20 positions, I saw some very interesting accounts.

What exactly?

Some have 0–1 subscriber, and aside from posts about bStocks there are no other posts—or almost none. It gives the impression that these are brand-new accounts.

I can’t claim that they are multi-accounts. I don’t have proof. I also don’t want to accuse people.

But admit it: the combination of having zero subscribers, no previous posts, and starting to post right from the very beginning of the campaign raises questions.

And here’s another question: how did a completely new account find out about the promotion on the very first day if they hadn’t participated in Creator Pad at all before?

Yes, I understand that news comes out, but even I—while actively being on the platform—I don’t always see it in time. And did zero accounts see it? But that’s not the main question—let’s set it aside.

Don’t misunderstand me—I’m not trying to complain.

As of today, I myself am in the second place on the leaderboard. There’s no reason for me to write this post because of my own result.

I just became curious to see which accounts are between my second place and the authors I know, who often show up in my feed and who have 20, 40, or even 100 thousand subscribers. And some of them aren’t even in the top 50 leaders.

Yes, I understand that a large audience by itself doesn’t guarantee good content. Maybe their posts really are weaker. I’m not disputing that. I was simply interested—and that’s what made me look at other accounts.

But when I saw some accounts between themselves and big authors—honestly, I was shocked.

And that’s why I want to ask one simple question:

If Creator Pad is created for authors, why is it enough to simply create an account and start publishing posts as part of the campaign, without any minimum audience or history of activity?

For a new author, this really could be a chance to start developing. And I’m absolutely not against such opportunities. On the contrary—“FOR” it.

But then why not set at least minimal entry requirements to separate beginner authors who genuinely want to develop from accounts created exclusively for a specific campaign? (Sorry, but that’s exactly how I see these accounts.)

For example:

— at least 20 / 50 / 100 subscribers;
— at least 1 / 2 / 5 posts in the last month;
— trading volume within “Write and Earn” for the last month greater than 0.

These are just my options. You could remove some things, add others, and make the conditions soft so that beginner authors also have a chance to develop.

I don’t expect @BinanceCIS an answer to this post from

I just want that one day there will be at least minimal entry requirements for Creator Pad, so that the program really has authors competing with each other.

Not zero accounts, but people who genuinely create content.