$GRAM
My reading of the indicator shows there are 5 points where there was strong buying during the decline.
As for pursuing the founder, it does not affect the application or the network, because it operates through multiple centers.
France has no objection to the network; it only wants to reveal privacy and monitor users, which violates French law.
Durov’s situation is completely safe.
With his signature, he can remove all this and operate like similar platforms—monitoring—but he defends people’s privacy and preventing their exploitation.
For example, people’s digital assets were stolen in a European country after their conversations were leaked by government sides to the thieves, and this has economic reasons.
Russia can’t do much; people still use the app after the ban.
And they won’t assassinate Durov because the goal is to apply pressure to get them to accept their terms.
Durov is trying to prevent spying on a billion users.
What if he is pursued by Americans as well? They won’t get anything, because protecting users is part of American law. There will be financial pressure, and investors will intervene and support Telegram’s next steps.
Banning the app will not affect the network’s operation at all. And it’s difficult—some countries saw political and internal impacts after banning social media apps.
The currency is at its lowest level and is temporarily going against the direction of the market.
Waiting for the announcement of the fourth phase: launching the gram wallet without KYC, integrated with Telegram without a third party.
I don’t know what surprises the remaining 6 stages will bring.
Do your own research: teli@ cryptocuai
My reading of the indicator shows there are 5 points where there was strong buying during the decline.
As for pursuing the founder, it does not affect the application or the network, because it operates through multiple centers.
France has no objection to the network; it only wants to reveal privacy and monitor users, which violates French law.
Durov’s situation is completely safe.
With his signature, he can remove all this and operate like similar platforms—monitoring—but he defends people’s privacy and preventing their exploitation.
For example, people’s digital assets were stolen in a European country after their conversations were leaked by government sides to the thieves, and this has economic reasons.
Russia can’t do much; people still use the app after the ban.
And they won’t assassinate Durov because the goal is to apply pressure to get them to accept their terms.
Durov is trying to prevent spying on a billion users.
What if he is pursued by Americans as well? They won’t get anything, because protecting users is part of American law. There will be financial pressure, and investors will intervene and support Telegram’s next steps.
Banning the app will not affect the network’s operation at all. And it’s difficult—some countries saw political and internal impacts after banning social media apps.
The currency is at its lowest level and is temporarily going against the direction of the market.
Waiting for the announcement of the fourth phase: launching the gram wallet without KYC, integrated with Telegram without a third party.
I don’t know what surprises the remaining 6 stages will bring.
Do your own research: teli@ cryptocuai
