4x Heat and Wear Continue to Misalign: AEON, BSB, and GRVT’s Turnover Differential Is Larger
In the 4x queue on August 7, AEON’s 24h trading volume was about 53.938 million, with an estimated rough wear of about 0.445%; BSB’s 24h trading volume was about 6.790 million, with an estimated rough wear of about 0.425%; GRVT’s 24h trading volume was about 4.561 million, with an estimated rough wear of about 0.523%. This shows that a 4x multiple doesn’t equal low cost—heat and wear must be analyzed separately. If you want to push the rankings, first add up everything that counts—buy volume only, trading fees, Gas, slippage, wear, and regional restrictions—before you do.
$AEON $BSB $GRVT #币安Alpha #Alpha日报 #4倍积分 #trading volume
In the 4x queue on August 7, AEON’s 24h trading volume was about 53.938 million, with an estimated rough wear of about 0.445%; BSB’s 24h trading volume was about 6.790 million, with an estimated rough wear of about 0.425%; GRVT’s 24h trading volume was about 4.561 million, with an estimated rough wear of about 0.523%. This shows that a 4x multiple doesn’t equal low cost—heat and wear must be analyzed separately. If you want to push the rankings, first add up everything that counts—buy volume only, trading fees, Gas, slippage, wear, and regional restrictions—before you do.
$AEON $BSB $GRVT #币安Alpha #Alpha日报 #4倍积分 #trading volume