#baby Recently, many friends have been especially excited about participating in Babylon and “making big profits and earning by holding.” It claims that you don’t need traditional cross-chain bridges to get returns—so it really does reduce the worry of funds being stolen through a bridge. But let’s be honest: once the coins are sent into a smart contract, it’s essentially no different from handing them to someone else to hold. After all, code is written by programmers—who can guarantee there will never be a bug? The little code hiccup earlier this year was a warning. In crypto, if a protocol hasn’t gone through a few rounds of hacker “pain and punishment,” everyone would do well to stay more vigilant.

What really makes me hesitate to place a big bet is how the ledger of $BABY works. It starts with a massive circulating base of ten billion, plus every year it “creates” an additional 8% of new tokens to distribute to stakers and holders. In plain terms, this is rewarding people by leveraging inflation. On the dashboard, it looks like the numbers go up every day and seem lively, but in reality, your actual purchasing power has long been diluted by the newly minted supply.

“Activate dormant assets”—this slogan sounds great, and the technical approach is also somewhat innovative. But please remember, guys: there’s no free lunch. For any high returns that are marketed under the banner of “zero risk,” there’s always a hidden price tag. If the underlying framework collapses, the interest you made probably won’t even cover the fraction of your principal.

My operating principle is simple: use some “small money” that you wouldn’t be heartbroken to lose anyway to mess around a bit, while keeping the main positions rock-solid in a hardware wallet, stored offline. In this market, staying alive always comes first. As for what @BabylonLabs_io is right now, it’s basically an early-stage test product—it still needs to survive a long period to be properly validated.