Despite a 60-vote margin, the (CLEAR Act) faces a Senate vote
Senate Majority Leader John Thune plans to push the (CLEAR Act) toward a floor vote on the lower end before the August recess, even if the crypto market structure bill cannot overcome a lengthy debate, potentially forcing senators to publicly declare their positions.
Summary
Although there is uncertainty about the required 60 votes, Thune wants a Senate vote before the August recess.
If all 53 Republican senators support cloture, Republicans would need roughly seven Democratic votes.
The revised draft includes temporary ethics restrictions on digital-asset activities by senior federal officials.
Polymarket traders put the odds of the bill becoming law in 2026 at about 33%.
Thune wants the senators to put on record their position on the (Clarity Bill)
Thune wants the Senate to begin considering the legislation before lawmakers leave Washington for their summer recess.
“I want at least to get Clarity started. We’ll see where the vote goes,” Thune said.
A floor vote will test whether months of negotiations have produced enough bipartisan support for the (Digital Asset Market Clarity Act) (formally known as H.R. 3633). If the bill fails to move forward, it will also determine the responsible senator.
With bipartisan support, the House passed the (Clarity Bill) in July 2025. The Senate Banking Committee later advanced part of the legislation in May 2026 by a 15–9 vote.
On July 22, Senator Cynthia Lummis released an updated version that incorporates proposals previously approved by the Senate Banking and Agriculture committees. The Senate plans to stay in Washington until August 7, giving lawmakers very little time to debate amendments and hold procedural votes. Lummis’ office confirmed that the new text combines the work of the two committees.
Democratic votes are still the main obstacle
Republicans hold 53 Senate seats, meaning the bill would need the support of about seven Democrats to reach the 60 votes required to overcome the lengthy debate, assuming every Republican supports the bill.
A group of seven Democratic senators led by Angela Alsobrooks believes the current proposal does not provide sufficient consumer protection or safeguards against illegal finance. Ethical rules covering senior government officials are another unresolved issue.
The updated bill includes a temporary restriction prohibiting federal officials, including the president and vice president, from issuing or sponsoring digital assets. The provision will expire in 2029.
Lummis acknowledged that the negotiations must balance Democrats’ demands for stricter moral rules with the risk of losing White House support. Senator Thom Tillis also said lawmakers are “not fully aligned” on moral arrangements.
These disagreements could leave Thune short on the votes needed to start formal debate. However, before the midterm election campaign heats up, holding a vote would create a public record and put greater pressure on undecided Democrats.
Police union endorsement removes an obstacle
After the National Fraternal Order of Police overturned its prior opposition and endorsed the revised bill, concerns about law enforcement eased.
The union represents more than 382,000 members, and after reviewing language related to (the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act), it changed its stance. The organization believes that the revised provisions preserve the ability of police and prosecutors to investigate crimes involving digital assets.
In its letter, the police union also cited safeguards to address fraud involving digital-asset booths, as well as anti–money laundering and sanctions obligations.
Its backing removed one source of resistance, but it did not resolve wider controversies regarding consumer protection, moral rules, and stablecoin incentives. Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong, Fidelity, and several crypto industry groups have called for it, while Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon supports market-structure legislation, though broader banking-industry concerns about stablecoin yield remain.
A failed vote could delay U.S. crypto rules
Supporters of the (Clarity Bill) say the legislation will establish clearer boundaries between the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. It will also set rules for digital commodities and certain non-custodial blockchain developers.
For U.S. crypto companies and investors, failure would leave major issues—such as token classification, exchange oversight, and federal jurisdiction—unaddressed in legislation. Institutional guidance may still shape the market, but future governments are more likely to modify these policies than laws passed by Congress.
Senator John Kennedy warned that if the Senate cannot secure enough yes votes before the August recess, the bill’s prospects will weaken.
The prediction market reflects this uncertainty. Polymarket traders currently assign odds of about 33% that the (Clarity Bill) will become law in 2026, while Galaxy Research estimates that figure has fallen to 30%.
As a result, the vote planned by Thune could determine whether negotiations continue with the new sense of urgency, or move into a midterm cycle with fewer floor speech hours in the Senate and more uncertain political balance.
BTC short-term trend analysis — bullish bounce today
Short-term resistance level: $65,500
Short-term support level: $62,800
ETH short-term trend analysis — bullish bounce today
Short-term resistance level: $1,890
Short-term support level: $1,800
👉 Follow the precision direction homepage for private messages to get it