China signaled the possibility of taxing Brazilian meat by up to 55%.
The curious thing is the difference in posture.
When the topic involves the United States, the discourse is immediate:
reciprocity, public criticism, and triggering the WTO.
When the subject is China, the reaction changes:
"it will be resolved through diplomacy," "with a good conversation."
Two weights, two measures?
Or does ideology influence more than economic interest?
In international trade, pragmatism should come before political alignment.

Do you agree or disagree?