If we say that "feminism" is the proletarian revolution of | 马思旗 on Binance Square

Post

--

If we say that "feminism" is the proletarian revolution of gender
then "crypto" is the proletarian revolution of finance

The evolutionary process is very similar

✅ First, the progressive representatives:
BTC and ETH burst onto the scene

✅ Then came the populism:
Elite VC coins were the first to snatch the fruits of the revolution
Later players had no choice but to pivot to meme coins

✅ Finally, the "rightward" opportunism:
Conspiracy groups, under the banner of memes, began to harvest
Community co-building evolved into a game for the few

Originally, it was the 2008 subprime crisis
The establishment was severely weakened
The progressive figure, Satoshi Nakamoto, saw the opportunity
Aiming to take down Wall Street

Now, we find that early elites have abandoned the progressive route
Allowing conspiracy groups to seize the chance to manipulate populism
Even colluding to harvest crypto believers together

It's worse than the establishment's blatant greed
Causing chaos everywhere

So why not return to a centrist route to initiate a coin-stock fusion
Temporarily cease fire with Wall Street to reach a "United Front" cooperation

Thus, we see the current major CEXs
Energetically embracing the surge of US stocks

马思旗

·

--

The "feminist movement" is basically the 21st-century proletarian revolution. Although it inevitably shifts from progressivism to populism, it represents a certain group's determination to resist oppression and exploitation.

It reflects a dramatic change in the production relations of the era, stemming from the great development of productive forces, but also declining due to stagnation. In between, there was a rise of extreme left populism, and even the emergence of "sugar baby literature" as a form of right-leaning opportunism.

However, true power comes from building a new distribution order. The saying goes, "political power grows out of the barrel of a gun"; merely having the discourse power without controlling the means of production isn't enough. Thinking about returning to a past distribution order reliant on coercion is also not viable when revolutionary success seems hopeless.

Whether it's today's popular individualism or the collective traditions of the past, any era that aims to establish a stable power structure must bear corresponding responsibilities, meaning rights and duties must be balanced. Thus, we need to wait for the transformation of production relations.

The persistent popularity of "Letters to Grandma" in the public discourse might signify a state-driven rectification of the "feminist movement" and even Western liberal thoughts, evolving from holding high the banner of progressivism to extreme left populism mixed with right-leaning opportunism, and then returning to a more institutional path moving forward.

At that moment, just like this moment, a century has passed, and history continues to cycle...

Disclaimer: Includes third-party opinions. No advice. Binance AI may be used without guarantee. See T&Cs.