I also used alpha123 for a while, and later switched to alpha520. My intuitive feeling is that alpha520 has more data and is more comprehensive. Then 123 also followed suit. So this is a new knight challenging the old king; I don't care who is right or wrong, it's all about the commissions tied to wallets. I only care about which one is easier to use.

Someone has already posted a response to 123, so I brought over the response to 520 as well.

The pages are all different, so how can there be claims of piracy?

It's all based on open-source data, so how can there be accusations of plagiarism?

@alpha123cc I only have one question: predicting the number of employees at alpha, is that considered innovation? Did you 'reference' us when you updated this feature after us? As for 'referencing' our airdrop allocation, let's not even mention that.

I don't know if you have ever been caught when using your own stability dashboard? When brushing those currencies that seem stable but have very small trading volumes, have you ever suddenly been caught for dozens of dollars? I have, and my friends around me have too. I have also seen many people posting complaints about it. Perhaps you have been caught, but you probably have never experienced the heart-wrenching feeling of being caught. You said because 'Alpha earnings are the kind of happiness for you that feels like picking up 10 yuan on the ground.' You may have forgotten that dozens of dollars mean hundreds of yuan, which is a college student's living expenses for half a month; if you add a chicken leg to your dinner, it can cover a month; buying a down jacket can keep you warm for a winter.

So when brushing transaction volume, you must pay attention to the transaction volume of the currency. If the trading liquidity is sufficient, the number of times and amounts you get caught will be much smaller (I don't know if everyone remembers that when the trading volume of WOD was 6 billion per day, the probability of getting caught while brushing was very low). I believe you understand this principle, but many novice users do not. Therefore, I have added a 24-hour trading volume on the brushing volume dashboard. My principle of judging products is to promote what is beneficial to users and remove what is useless, allowing retail investors to reduce unnecessary losses, which is my greatest pursuit. All Bitcoin code functions are completely open, and everyone can continuously optimize based on this. The open-source spirit of blockchain is precisely the cornerstone of the flourishing development of Web3; optimizing on this basis, how can it be called plagiarism? You have also increased the number of airdrop shares and updated the function for the number of employees; are you also plagiarizing? Why do you avoid discussing this? Similarly, currently all functions of Alpha520 are also publicly available for free. However, if you are very concerned about the brushing volume dashboard, I can change it; after all, using this to brush will also get caught.

Why did I create Alpha520?

Because this Alpha earnings are quite good for me, but I often encounter the embarrassing situation of not having enough points facing big hair, especially since October, Alpha has become exceptionally difficult. The core of profitability lies in whether one can predict small and big hair. I started browsing various information like crazy. I found that through on-chain data, I could infer the number of airdrop shares, know the shares, estimate points, judge selling pressure, and decide whether to adjust the pattern, but Alpha123 does not have it.

I always see people issuing big hair warnings, and I also want to warn about big hair and leave points. Then I found that financing data is very important, but Alpha123 does not have it.

Then Alpha520 was born. What Alpha520 aims to do is to ensure that those who truly care about Alpha earnings can receive better returns.

I used to not understand why such simple data was not available in Alpha123, but after reading your post, I understand.

First of all, we must admit the excellence of Alpha123 and acknowledge your excellence because you have made money, and you must be very excellent. However, because 'Alpha earnings are the kind of happiness for me that feels like picking up 10 yuan on the ground,' it is very difficult for those for whom Alpha earnings represent a month's salary, like college students and the elderly, to develop empathy. It is hard for someone who has become rich first to continue building.

PS: Alpha520 adjusted the font size to be very large so that the elderly don't feel tired looking at it.

Why was there this teasing?

As the product deepened, I found that I could estimate the number of employees in Alpha through trading data. Then, you, who have not updated for thousands of years, just happened to update the same function right after we launched this feature and also synchronized the update for the shares function. We discovered key data that you had not noticed and indirectly received your recognition. At that moment, youthful exuberance got the better of me, and I couldn't help but show off publicly. — This teasing was my fault. But conversely, can your behavior of following up and updating functions be considered plagiarism?

After showing off, I found that the number of employees you displayed for Alpha was 700,000, which is completely an unreliable figure. Then you went online directly and pushed it fully; this is truly an irresponsible approach.

I can't help but ask: if today you can treat products casually and be perfunctory towards users, how can people believe that you will take user data security and asset safety seriously when your website eventually opens the user wallet integration feature? This may sound harsh, but the arrogance behind this perfunctory attitude actually hides enormous risks. Once a theft incident occurs, the security of user data will completely collapse.

As you said, the blockchain field is like a dark forest, and security is always the top priority. You may come from a wealthy family, and as an expert on-chain, you can make money anywhere. Alpha earnings are just a small profit for you. But please don’t bring this arrogance into the product. 'Blockchain is a dark forest, and trust is the most expensive and scarce asset.' Don't let this arrogance betray the trust users have in you. When dealing with products and users, I hope we can always maintain a mindset of walking on thin ice.

If our existence can give you more motivation to update, then that is also a small contribution we make for users.

Of course, I admit again that my words this time were indeed blunt, and I will reflect on that. Issues like this should have been reminded in private, not publicly stated; this was my mistake.

Finally, I will show a comparison of screenshots of the main interfaces of two products. The users can naturally judge which is which. The pages are different in every aspect, so where does the claim of piracy come from?