alpha new model, a "compromise out of necessity"

Hello everyone, I am Mike.
Tonight's $PIGGY airdrop adopts a brand new "high score priority, dynamic score reduction" model. Many people cheer that this is a reform, but I believe it is more like an official "last resort".

1. Why do I say it's a "last resort"?
We must understand the background of this model's introduction:
Throughout October, due to the proliferation of scripts, a large number of genuine high-scoring users couldn't grab a single airdrop. Every day they worked hard to earn points, but their points were just "in circulation", with only continuous wear and tear, and no return at all. The community's grievances have reached a peak.
The official's dilemma: Thorough risk control governance takes time and cannot be accomplished overnight. But users' patience is limited.
Therefore, the emergence of this new model, I believe its primary purpose is not "reform", but to maintain market enthusiasm.
Its essence is to provide a temporary "green channel" for those high-scoring users who have been tormented by scripts for a month, allowing them to consume some points to recover a bit of loss, so they do not completely collapse in mentality and "quit".

2. My judgment: This is just a "transitional model"
Based on the above analysis, I judge that this complex model will not be the norm.
It is a "wartime strategy" under the background of an incomplete risk control system and a boiling community's grievances, a "transitional model".

Once the official risk control measures truly take effect and can effectively restrain studios, I believe the mainstream model of airdrops will eventually return to a simpler, more universal "first come, first served".

This change is an active response from the officials after listening to our voices, which is commendable. But we must also recognize clearly that this is merely a symptomatic "painkiller"; true root treatment still requires waiting for the final effectiveness of the risk control "surgical knife".
#ALPHA #币安Alpha上新 $BNB