Introduction — The problem to be solved
Hello organizers and community,
I am a real user, submitting this proposal because of frustration with the state of airdrop farming using bots/farm accounts. Tens of thousands of automated accounts (bot farms) are sucking up rewards — while real users miss out on airdrops. The largest exchanges with loose operations and unprofessional handling will lead to a loss of trust in the ecosystem.
⸻
Describe the current situation (summary)
• Farm airdrop with hundreds to thousands of accounts (100–1000 acc) can be 'nurtured' and capital rotated to evade the system.
• Those accounts holding very little (under $100–$300) but still receiving rewards are unfair to users with a genuine hold history.
• The current risk system is easily bypassed by multiple machines, VPN, using someone to verify KYC, or rule-bending services.
• Result: real users suffer, trust decreases, airdrop quality drops.
⸻
Propose policies (clear, enforceable)
1. Basic participation conditions — Minimum hold:
• Accounts must hold ≥ $300 on average in the last 6 months to qualify.
• Or replace with ≥ $600 as a safety criterion (applicable for higher value airdrops).
• Or token standard: ≥ 0.5 BNB (or equivalent) held for 6 months for the BNB network.
2. Higher safety threshold for large airdrops:
• For valuable airdrops/promotions, apply a threshold of ≥ $600 to prevent small farms from taking advantage of capital rotation.
3. Bind financial responsibilities for farm accounts:
• If fraud is detected, rewards will be confiscated and accumulated/deducted from the USD balance/rating of the related accounts.
• Gradual penalties: warnings → reward lock → permanent account lock if recidivism occurs.
4. Behavior verification (beyond KYC):
• Combine on-chain analysis (pattern swap, capital rotation), app behavior (multi-login, IP/VPN), and hold history.
• Use risk score: accounts must reach a minimum score to qualify. Points deducted if: many small tx, rotation through many wallets in a short time, multiple KYC from the same device/IP.
5. Transparency of criteria & complaints:
• Clearly disclose eligibility criteria and how to calculate risk score.
• Transparent complaint mechanism, feedback within a short time (e.g., 14 days), with clear evidence.
6. Encourage genuine holding & rewards for loyalty:
• Give bonuses to accounts that hold long (e.g., add allocation rate if holding ≥ $300 for 6 months).
• Rewards specifically for “Verified Long-Term Holders” to encourage the opportunity cost of real users.
⸻
Technical implementation method (summary)
• Build a combined point system (risk score): average hold days, trading volume, number of related addresses, device fingerprint, KYC history.
• Integrate on-chain analytics: detect unusual capital flows (circular swaps, micro-tx pattern).
• Apply the 'safe deposit' law held during investigations (like escrow), avoid immediate rewards if there are signs of risk.
⸻
Benefits of implementing this policy
• Return fairness to real users, increase platform trust.
• Reduce indirect costs from bot farms: reduce system load, reduce fraud.
• Higher quality airdrop — tokens to legitimate users who can contribute long-term to the ecosystem.
⸻
Conclusion — Call to action
The exchange must be proactive, strong, and transparent. Don't let rewards fall into the hands of farm accounts — that is losing community value. I suggest the RISK_ALPHA team and the board consider applying a hold threshold of +6 months, min-balance $300–$600, confiscation penalties for fraud, and a transparent point mechanism to protect real users.
Thank you to the organizers for listening. I believe a few simple yet drastic changes will restore fairness to airdrops — and protect the future of the ecosystem.
⸻
Hashtags (repeat for easy sharing):
#AntiFarmAirdrop #ProtectRealUsers #NoBotFarms #FairAirdrop #GenuineHold #SafeRewardDistribution #RISK_ALPHA #Min600USD #Min0_5BNB