We notice that the names of the leaders are constantly repeated, and despite the correspondence and complaints, the situation remains unchanged, as if the points of some accounts are continuously added while others are ignored. This raises many questions about the point calculation mechanism and the nature of management within Binance Square.

We have contacted support multiple times, but the response has often been neglect, with the points of a certain group continuously increasing, as if the share is reserved for them only. Surprisingly, they ask for additional pictures every time, even though the profile is already verified with them.

So who are these leaders? Are they from the platform team with special accounts, or interconnected groups benefiting from the system, or does the platform not want to lose them at the expense of other users? These questions raise concerns about fairness and credibility within the system.

Also, some reward systems like Alpha points and others give the impression that they serve only large institutions, as it seems that wealthy individuals are getting richer, while the average user finds their opportunities very limited.

Equal opportunity is the foundation of any successful community or competition. A clear and transparent system for calculating points and rewards gives every diligent person their due and enhances user trust, away from favoritism or financial influence.

We want to hear your opinions and experiences… Do you think the competition within Square is fair? Have you faced the same issues? Share your thoughts in the comments or the survey below.

If you like, I can draft a stronger and more provocative version that attracts greater interaction, so that its style is argumentative and stimulates people to respond and participate extensively.