Dusk's recent voting hides the future code of on-chain finance

Recently, the vote thrown out by @Dusk really woke me up; it asked a soul-stirring question: In on-chain finance, which is the most critical—privacy, compliance, liquidity, or speed?

This question seems simple but actually hits the industry's pain point, and the community's answers are particularly sincere—most people chose privacy! It turns out everyone understands that privacy is not an optional side dish but the main course of on-chain finance; it is essential.

Especially for institutional players, many public chains' open ledgers are like rooms with open windows; how much they hold, their trading strategies, and rebalancing times are all exposed to MEV bots, which is equivalent to revealing their bottom cards. No matter how high the liquidity is, it is toxic, and they simply cannot enter with confidence.

Moreover, the vote from #Dusk is not just an interactive gimmick; it is its product roadmap! What it is doing now is equipping on-chain finance with a "defensive shield," achieving auditable privacy through Phoenix and Hedger—hiding core information from the public while opening an audit channel for regulators, protecting privacy while maintaining compliance.

It is evident that Dusk is building a nest to attract the phoenix; it is now accelerating the implementation of privacy contracts and promoting securities on-chain in anticipation of the RWA explosion in 2026. By then, it will be clear that those public chains that only pursue TPS and ignore privacy are mere vases, while those like $DUSK that balance privacy and compliance are the true homes for whales and institutions!