I see that the Asian shock has been absorbed, I will try to think in a logic of reform or pragmatism. I know that in some cases, and mostly in this market, the logic of 1+1=2 does not hold; here it could mean 0 or 9. But the logic remains logic, and some voices throughout the week have boasted that Bitcoin has stabilized against gold and that it is a safe haven. So will the market maker for Bitcoin harm his own reputation? At that time, governments will not enter; the markets that reject this field will confirm the words of the rejecters that it is a volatile asset. In fact, it is highly volatile, so there is no talk of a safe haven or reserves after that in Congress.