Sam Bankman-Fried appeared in court this week, denying any irregularities between FTX and Alameda Research, although he admitted to "serious mistakes" in the process.

Sam “SBF” Bankman-Fried Testifies in Court

Sam “SBF” Bankman-Fried stood in court this week as part of his ongoing criminal trial at the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. He argued that there were no irregularities between #FTX and Alameda Research, but at the same time, he admitted to "serious mistakes" caused by the company's rapid growth. He formally began testifying on October 27th, a day after a preliminary hearing without the presence of a jury. In responding to the government lawyers’ questions, he struggled, and the next day, when facing the jury, he seemed to be better prepared.

 Key Moments of SBF’s Testimony

During his testimony this week, he denied urging his closest associates to provide millions in political donations in 2021 and stated that the terms of use of FTX cover transactions between Alameda and the #cryptocurrency exchange. He also noted that he called for the implementation of additional hedging strategies for Alameda in 2021 and 2022, but these were never realized.

 Defense and Prosecution of SBF

The defense is expected to complete the examination of Bankman-Fried on October 30th, after which cross-examinations and closing statements of both sides will follow. Prosecutors also plan to subpoena another witness for next week.

 SBF Denies Accusations of Political Donations

Bankman-Fried denied instructing Ryan Salame and Nishad Singh to direct millions of dollars to political campaigns. However, he admitted that lobbying in Washington, DC, was crucial for his effort to regulate the crypto company in the USA in 2021.

 Sam Bankman-Fried's Perspective on the FTX Situation

Sam Bankman-Fried, also known as SBF, recently testified in court, vehemently denying any wrongdoing in relation to the collapse of FTX and Alameda Research. Nevertheless, he admitted to several “major mistakes.”

 Court Appearance

SBF appeared before the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York to testify in his ongoing criminal trial. He strongly denied any improprieties between FTX and Alameda Research, although he acknowledged that significant errors were made during the company’s rapid growth phase. His testimony began on October 27th, a day after a preliminary hearing in the absence of a jury. During the hearing, he attempted to answer questions from government lawyers, and the following day, he appeared before the jury much better prepared.

 Key Moments of the Testimony

During his testimony, SBF denied instructing his inner circle to make million-dollar political donations in 2021. He also claimed that FTX’s terms of use covered transactions between Alameda and the cryptocurrency exchange. He stated that he requested additional hedging strategies for Alameda in 2021 and 2022, but these were never implemented. The defense is expected to conclude its examination of SBF on October 30th, followed by cross-examinations and closing statements.

 SBF and Political Donations

SBF refuted claims that he directed Ryan Salame and Nishad Singh to contribute millions of dollars to political campaigns. However, he acknowledged that lobbying in Washington, DC, played a crucial role in his efforts to establish a regulatory framework for crypto companies in the USA in 2021. The prosecution alleges that SBF used customer deposit funds from FTX to finance more than $100 million in political contributions ahead of the 2022 U.S. elections. SBF denied this, stating that FTX had revenues exceeding $1 billion in 2021 and that political contributions were made from the exchange's own resources.

 The New York Times Test

SBF also spoke about the internal communication policy at FTX and Alameda Research, based on the so-called "New York Times Test." The goal was for employees to avoid sending messages that could later embarrass them if they appeared on the front page of the newspaper. He explained that even seemingly innocent things could be misunderstood out of context. This approach was part of his explanation for why more than 200 communication channels on Signal had a policy of automatically deleting messages after a week.

 Credit Line and Alameda’s Role

SBF also discussed Alameda's unique role on FTX. Alameda served as the payment provider for FTX for bank transactions, as well as the primary liquidity provider, market maker, and a client of the exchange. He detailed how Alameda had to cover customer losses in the event of a failure of FTX’s risk engine, and further explained that the trading firm had a line of credit with FTX that was used to facilitate these payments. This line of credit was a crucial part of the financial relationship between FTX and Alameda, and SBF’s testimony provided a rare insight into the inner workings of his cryptocurrency empire.

Follow #SpaceCatch and Stay Tuned For More Crypto News🔔

 Notice:

,,The information and views presented in this article are intended solely for educational purposes and should not be taken as investment advice in any situation. The content of these pages should not be regarded as financial, investment, or any other form of advice. We caution that investing in cryptocurrencies can be risky and may lead to financial losses.“