There is another problem, that is, when btc has reached station 3, eth is still at station 1. If we assume that btc reaches station 2 this time (just assume), where will eth go? And if we continue to assume, #btc reaches station 1, where will eth go?
So, although the price may never follow this assumption, we still see the problem between eth and btc. #BTC☀ is the market standard, the strength or weakness of the token depends on how it grows compared to btc.
If the token increases more strongly than btc, that is too good, unreasonably good. If the token increases in parallel with btc, that is a dream, if the token increases almost as much as btc, that is normal, but if the token increasingly falls behind btc, it will be very easy to scam.
‼️
Nowadays, after all these years of trying to accumulate and develop, eth has been left further and further behind by btc. And you know, btc has not innovated its technology
It has not done anything, it is still the same as it was a dozen years ago. So how can a hard-working guy fall further and further behind the guy who does nothing?
So this part of eth being questioned is not wrong at all. Even if it cannot keep up with btc, it should not go backwards.
