Honestly, I used to think that "high performance" and "sustainability" were basically opposing terms in public chains. To be fast, you have to burn resources; to be stable, you have to pile on costs. But the more I look at
#Vanar , the more I feel it’s about finding a different way to solve problems.
Vanar doesn’t just pursue extremes
#TPS , but controls performance within the range of "real applications that are just enjoyable to use." Now, in high-frequency scenarios, transaction confirmation times are basically stable at 1–2 seconds, and even under peak loads, they rarely exceed 3 seconds. This level is already sufficient for the metaverse, gaming, and AI interactions, without interrupting the experience.
The key is how it achieves "not relying on piling up energy consumption."
Vanar’s green node network keeps the average daily energy consumption of a single node under about 2 kWh, far lower than traditional compute-oriented networks. Nodes do not require expensive hardware and do not depend on centralized computing pools, resulting in: wider distribution of nodes, more controllable energy consumption, and more stable operating costs.
I think there’s a very realistic judgment here:
If the performance of a chain is achieved by "burning money and burning electricity," then it is destined to be unsuitable for long-term support of brands, AI, and large-scale users. The thinking of
#Vanar is more like reserving space for the future—performance is usable, but costs are predictable, and energy consumption is traceable.
This is also why it can support millions of on-chain high-frequency interactions every day, without pushing the network into an unsustainable state. For me, this is much more convincing than shouting "environmental slogans."
Vanar is not choosing between performance or sustainability, but rather acknowledging reality and bringing both back onto the same track for long-term operation.
@Vanarchain $VANRY #Vanar