oracleproblem
20 views
3 Discussing
Hot
Latest
Don't be fooled by the name 'Oracle'; it's just a delivery person who might be late at any time.
Everyone, today I want to talk to you about that mysterious 'Oracle'. Many people think it's the gatekeeper of blockchain, but to me, it resembles a delivery person who could mess things up at any moment.
Blockchain itself is blind and can't see what's happening in the real world. Traditional oracles are like errand runners, fetching data (like currency prices, game results) from outside and throwing it in. The problem arises: what if the delivery person changes the order on the way, or the delivery is late (delayed), wouldn't that make the transaction void? This is what is called the 'Oracle Problem'.
Vanar wants to go big this time; it doesn't plan to find a delivery person but instead moves the kitchen home. By compressing data through Neutron and storing it directly on the chain, it allows the Kayon engine to read and calculate by itself. This isn't just showing off; it's to fundamentally solve the trust crisis with that 'external AI'.
Also, don’t tell me that Google is just a name. What I care about is what was mentioned in the data: Vanar directly invoked Google's 'High-speed internal internet'. For AI reasoning, latency is a fatal weakness. With a giant's physical fiber backing it up, allowing verification nodes to run directly in green energy data centers, this AI chain's game has real significance.
I don't look at advertising slogans; I look at whether this 'data fiber' can outperform the traditional telephone. Currently, market sentiment is stuck in the 'fear' zone, with currency prices hovering around $0.0083, but this kind of physical hard power confrontation cannot be understood just by looking at candlestick charts.
#Vanar $VANRY @Vanarchain #OracleProblem #GoogleCloud #AIInfrastructure
Everyone, today I want to talk to you about that mysterious 'Oracle'. Many people think it's the gatekeeper of blockchain, but to me, it resembles a delivery person who could mess things up at any moment.
Blockchain itself is blind and can't see what's happening in the real world. Traditional oracles are like errand runners, fetching data (like currency prices, game results) from outside and throwing it in. The problem arises: what if the delivery person changes the order on the way, or the delivery is late (delayed), wouldn't that make the transaction void? This is what is called the 'Oracle Problem'.
Vanar wants to go big this time; it doesn't plan to find a delivery person but instead moves the kitchen home. By compressing data through Neutron and storing it directly on the chain, it allows the Kayon engine to read and calculate by itself. This isn't just showing off; it's to fundamentally solve the trust crisis with that 'external AI'.
Also, don’t tell me that Google is just a name. What I care about is what was mentioned in the data: Vanar directly invoked Google's 'High-speed internal internet'. For AI reasoning, latency is a fatal weakness. With a giant's physical fiber backing it up, allowing verification nodes to run directly in green energy data centers, this AI chain's game has real significance.
I don't look at advertising slogans; I look at whether this 'data fiber' can outperform the traditional telephone. Currently, market sentiment is stuck in the 'fear' zone, with currency prices hovering around $0.0083, but this kind of physical hard power confrontation cannot be understood just by looking at candlestick charts.
#Vanar $VANRY @Vanarchain #OracleProblem #GoogleCloud #AIInfrastructure
Liquidation Is Not A Trading Problem. It Is An Oracle Problem.
Most high-leverage traders blame the exchange or their own strategy when a position evaporates. The critical, overlooked question is this: Did the data feeding the liquidation engine even deserve your trust?
In volatile markets, one bad price print on a small, illiquid venue can hit your account harder than a major trend reversal. If the oracle listens blindly to that outlier, your position is gone, even if the rest of the market never traded there for long. This architectural vulnerability is the part of the system nobody sees.
This is why data filtering is non-negotiable. Instead of acting like a simple price pipe, a robust system checks multiple venues, analyzes volume dynamics, searches for strange moves, and only then sends a final, secure price on-chain.
For a trader, this means a random wick on a thin exchange loses its power to erase weeks of work. On platforms like $AT, where sophisticated oracles like $APRO are securing large spot and perpetual volume, this difference is not theory. It is the silent reason why some positions survive strange spikes that would have killed them on other platforms. When data is filtered, leverage becomes slightly less toxic and the system becomes fairer for both sides.
Not financial advice. Trade at your own risk.
#OracleProblem #DeFiRisk #APRO #CryptoSafety 🧠
Most high-leverage traders blame the exchange or their own strategy when a position evaporates. The critical, overlooked question is this: Did the data feeding the liquidation engine even deserve your trust?
In volatile markets, one bad price print on a small, illiquid venue can hit your account harder than a major trend reversal. If the oracle listens blindly to that outlier, your position is gone, even if the rest of the market never traded there for long. This architectural vulnerability is the part of the system nobody sees.
This is why data filtering is non-negotiable. Instead of acting like a simple price pipe, a robust system checks multiple venues, analyzes volume dynamics, searches for strange moves, and only then sends a final, secure price on-chain.
For a trader, this means a random wick on a thin exchange loses its power to erase weeks of work. On platforms like $AT, where sophisticated oracles like $APRO are securing large spot and perpetual volume, this difference is not theory. It is the silent reason why some positions survive strange spikes that would have killed them on other platforms. When data is filtered, leverage becomes slightly less toxic and the system becomes fairer for both sides.
Not financial advice. Trade at your own risk.
#OracleProblem #DeFiRisk #APRO #CryptoSafety 🧠
Login to explore more contents