#layertree

layertree

60 views

16 Discussing

Hot

Latest

·

--

⚡ $BTC SCALING BLUEPRINT UNVEILED AS LAYERTREE TARGETS ONE MILLION USERS PER UTXO 🦈

Lightning Labs just introduced LayerTree, a structural breakthrough aiming to anchor up to one million users inside a single $BTC UTXO. 💡 By committing off-chain balances via Merkle-sum trees, the protocol unlocks native unilateral exits into the Lightning Network without custodial compromises.

This architecture fundamentally reshapes base-layer efficiency and on-chain liquidity dynamics. 📊 However, full mainnet deployment hinges on pending covenant opcodes, keeping this strictly in institutional research territory for now. 💬 Do you see soft fork consensus arriving fast enough to support this scale? 👇

⚠️ Not financial advice. Always manage your risk. 🛡️

🏷️ #BTC #LayerTree #LightningNetwork #Bitcoin

🎯 🦈

·

--

Lightning Network CTO drops a 103-page paper: lots of people squeezed into one $BTC UTXO

Lightning Labs’ Olaoluwa Osuntokun (roasbeef) unveiled LayerTree on October 15: many people share one Bitcoin output, with balances recorded in an off-chain Merkle-sum tree. Anyone can exit unilaterally in a single transaction, with no timelock or presigning; the operator cannot take the funds or block a valid exit.
The numbers on paper: at depth 16 (about 65,000 slots), a solo exit is about 1,020 vB—roughly 9 times the size of an ordinary individual spend, but still lighter than a comparable Ark-style exit at about 2,511 vB. With around 1,000 people joining in a batch, the per-person cost can drop below 1 vB.
The hard constraints need to be made clear: because it relies on script opcodes that have not yet been activated, it cannot run on the current $BTC mainnet. The operator controls admission, not exits; everyone shares the same output, so simultaneous withdrawals compete for confirmation bandwidth. The paper and reference implementation are at layertree.tech, and Bitcoin.com has also covered it.

·

--

LayerTree: A New Approach to Bitcoin Scaling

LayerTree, a new Bitcoin scaling solution, enables shared UTXOs and off-chain payments. Track fund flows and understand whale movements behind Bitcoin scaling. #比特币扩容 #LayerTree

·

--

LayerTree: A New Approach to Bitcoin Scaling

LayerTree, a new Bitcoin scaling solution, shares UTXOs and off-chain payments, tracks fund flows, and reveals whale movements behind Bitcoin scaling.#比特币扩容 #LayerTree

Taren Linenberger yq6D

·

--

LayerTree: A New Approach to Bitcoin Scaling

LayerTree, a new Bitcoin scaling solution, uses shared UTXOs and off-chain payments to track the flow of funds and reveal whale movements behind Bitcoin scaling.#比特币扩容 #LayerTree

·

--

LayerTree: A New Approach to Bitcoin Scaling

LayerTree, a new Bitcoin scaling solution, shares UTXOs and off-chain payments to track fund flows and reveal whale movements behind Bitcoin scaling. #比特币扩容 #LayerTree

Arnette Merriam

·

--

LayerTree: A New Approach to Bitcoin Scaling

LayerTree, a new Bitcoin scaling solution, combines shared UTXOs with off-chain payments. Track the flow of funds and get a closer look at whale activity behind Bitcoin scaling. #比特币扩容 #LayerTree

·

--

LayerTree: A New Approach to Bitcoin Scaling

The new LayerTree Bitcoin scaling solution combines shared UTXOs and off-chain payments. Track the flow of funds and understand whale movements behind Bitcoin scaling. #比特币扩容 #LayerTree

·

--

📰 Lightning Labs co-founder Olaoluwa Osuntokun proposed LayerTree: letting thousands or even millions of users share a single Bitcoin UTXO while keeping track of each person’s balance and preserving their right to exit unilaterally. It sounds like bringing an exchange’s “everyone shares one pool of money” model on-chain, but the key difference is that users don’t have to trust only the operator’s database. 💡 LayerTree stores users’ balances in an off-chain Merkle Sum Tree, while the chain holds only the shared UTXO and a commitment to the tree’s root. The sum of the balances in the tree must match the funds in the UTXO, and changing any leaf node changes the root. To exit, a user can submit their leaf node, Merkle proof, and signature without the operator’s approval. Here, O(1) means exiting requires just one transaction; it doesn’t mean the proof size stays constant. The proof still grows as O(log N) with the number of users. 🔥 Everyday transfers try to avoid touching on-chain state. A Channel leaf puts a Lightning channel in a tree leaf, with the operator forwarding payments as HTLCs; a voucher is more like a digital check that can be redeemed on-chain. Once the recipient has a signed voucher, they can submit a CLAIM themselves if the operator won’t cooperate, allowing the script to deduct funds from the payer’s balance and create a new leaf. 🤔 But “redeemable on-chain” doesn’t mean risk-free. Alice could sign vouchers for two people that each exceed her balance. Both signatures would be genuine, but there wouldn’t be enough money to cover both, so whoever submits first might get paid. Older vouchers could also become invalid when the leaf’s state number is updated, so until a voucher is settled, it still carries the issuer’s credit risk. 📌 The most appealing part of this design is that it keeps everyday payments off-chain while giving users a way to exit on their own. The real challenge is handling unsettled vouchers and competition over balances. Would you be willing to put your funds into this kind of shared UTXO structure? #比特币 #LayerTree #LightningNetwork #BlockchainScaling

📰 Lightning Labs co-founder Olaoluwa Osuntokun proposed LayerTree: letting thousands or even millions of users share a single Bitcoin UTXO while keeping track of each person’s balance and preserving their right to exit unilaterally. It sounds like bringing an exchange’s “everyone shares one pool of money” model on-chain, but the key difference is that users don’t have to trust only the operator’s database.

💡 LayerTree stores users’ balances in an off-chain Merkle Sum Tree, while the chain holds only the shared UTXO and a commitment to the tree’s root. The sum of the balances in the tree must match the funds in the UTXO, and changing any leaf node changes the root. To exit, a user can submit their leaf node, Merkle proof, and signature without the operator’s approval. Here, O(1) means exiting requires just one transaction; it doesn’t mean the proof size stays constant. The proof still grows as O(log N) with the number of users.

🔥 Everyday transfers try to avoid touching on-chain state. A Channel leaf puts a Lightning channel in a tree leaf, with the operator forwarding payments as HTLCs; a voucher is more like a digital check that can be redeemed on-chain. Once the recipient has a signed voucher, they can submit a CLAIM themselves if the operator won’t cooperate, allowing the script to deduct funds from the payer’s balance and create a new leaf.

🤔 But “redeemable on-chain” doesn’t mean risk-free. Alice could sign vouchers for two people that each exceed her balance. Both signatures would be genuine, but there wouldn’t be enough money to cover both, so whoever submits first might get paid. Older vouchers could also become invalid when the leaf’s state number is updated, so until a voucher is settled, it still carries the issuer’s credit risk.

📌 The most appealing part of this design is that it keeps everyday payments off-chain while giving users a way to exit on their own. The real challenge is handling unsettled vouchers and competition over balances. Would you be willing to put your funds into this kind of shared UTXO structure?

#比特币 #LayerTree #LightningNetwork #BlockchainScaling

Log in to explore more content