Moonwell has just been targeted, and someone is launching a low-cost governance attack through malicious proposals, attempting to forcibly seize control of the protocol.
This feels too familiar, a typical DAO governance vulnerability tactic of "stealing home." The attacker is causing trouble with low-threshold proposals, and once the control of the protocol changes hands, the TVL in the pool can easily become a cash machine. From a fundamental perspective, security and governance stability are the lifeblood of lending protocols, and this operation directly puts the protocol's reputation on the line.
The core issue now is whether the multi-signature can intercept in time and whether the community vote can achieve a counterattack. If such a low-cost attack can succeed, it indicates a serious underlying logical flaw in the governance structure, and the valuation model may need to be rewritten. Do you think this kind of outdated governance routine means there is still hope for DAO? #Moonwell #DeFi
#GovernanceAttack