Hello readers, I am the uncle. In last night's highly valuable AMA, there was a technical detail that I listened to three times, which is about the positioning of Dusk EVM.
Many people ask: Since there is our own original privacy settlement protocol DSDS (Distributed Settlement and Delivery System), why do we still need to be EVM compatible? Is this a compromise to the market? After listening to the CTO's explanation, I realized that this is actually a very clever layout.
1. Not a subsidiary, but 'co-origin twin'